Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy
- Publisher:
- Suffolk University Law School
- Publication date:
- 2009-06-05
- ISBN:
- 1535-3419
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
- Vol. 27 No. 2, June 2022
- Vol. 27 No. 1, January 2022
- Vol. 26 No. 2, June 2021
- Vol. 26 No. 1, January 2021
- Vol. 25 No. 2, June 2019
- Vol. 25 No. 1, January 2019
- Vol. 24 No. 2, June 2018
- Vol. 24 No. 1, January 2018
- Vol. 18 No. 2, June - June 2013
- Vol. 18 No. 1, February - February 2013
- Vol. 17 No. 2, June 2012
- Vol. 17 No. 1, February 2012
- No. 16, January 2011
- No. 15, January 2010
- No. 14, January 2009
- No. 12, January 2007
- No. 11, January 2006
Latest documents
- Civil procedure--Supreme Court's Vaden decision regarding federal question jurisdiction does not apply to diversity jurisdiction--Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC v. Rutherford, 605 F.3d 483 (8th Cir. 2010).
- THE DEMISE OF THE LAW-DEVELOPING FUNCTION: A CASE STUDY OF THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT.
- Executing the insane: a look at death penalty schemes in Arkansas, Georgia and Texas.
- Defining patent eligibility by extrapolating the judicial outlook of software onto biotechnology patents.
- CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - DANGERS OF THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS STATE-CREATED DANGER EXCEPTION - IRISH V. FOWLER, 979 F.3D 65 (1ST CIR. 2020).
- Claim accrual under the Federal Tort Claims Act: when should claimants file suit against the Federal Bureau of Investigation for tort liability?
- Say what? Confusion in the courts over what is the proper standard of review for hearsay rulings.
- 'NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS': THE FUTURE OF COSMETIC ANIMAL TESTING IN THE U.S. AND BEYOND.
- MASSACHUSETTS NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT ACT: A ROSE OF A DIFFERENT COLOR.
- EDITOR'S NOTE.
Featured documents
- Civil procedure--Supreme Court's Vaden decision regarding federal question jurisdiction does not apply to diversity jurisdiction--Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC v. Rutherford, 605 F.3d 483 (8th Cir. 2010).
- THE DEMISE OF THE LAW-DEVELOPING FUNCTION: A CASE STUDY OF THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT.
- Executing the insane: a look at death penalty schemes in Arkansas, Georgia and Texas.
- Defining patent eligibility by extrapolating the judicial outlook of software onto biotechnology patents.
- CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - DANGERS OF THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS STATE-CREATED DANGER EXCEPTION - IRISH V. FOWLER, 979 F.3D 65 (1ST CIR. 2020).
- Claim accrual under the Federal Tort Claims Act: when should claimants file suit against the Federal Bureau of Investigation for tort liability?
- Say what? Confusion in the courts over what is the proper standard of review for hearsay rulings.
- 'NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS': THE FUTURE OF COSMETIC ANIMAL TESTING IN THE U.S. AND BEYOND.
- MASSACHUSETTS NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT ACT: A ROSE OF A DIFFERENT COLOR.
- EDITOR'S NOTE.