US v. Witherspoon (4th Cir. 1998 00:00:00)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (December 03, 1998)

Docket number: 98-7316
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/18178729
Id. vLex: VLEX-18178729

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7316 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

OSTER WITHERSPOON, a/k/a Little Man, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-91-288, CA-96-3536-8-2)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oster Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, As-

sistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Oster Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Witherspoon , Nos. CR-91- 288; CA-96-3536-8-2 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED