Egan v. Hauffman (4th Cir. 2003)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (August 21, 2003)

Docket number: 03-6824
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/18201194
Id. vLex: VLEX-18201194

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6824 DAWN MAUREEN EGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

PATRICIA L. HAUFFMAN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-180-A)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dawn Maureen Egan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Dawn Maureen Egan seeks to appeal the district court§ 2254 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Egan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Other documents:
45 CFR 303.1 Definitions. | 43 CFR 2625.0-3 - Authority. | State v Sides Ohio 2006 | 24 cfr 882.803 - project eligibility and other requirements. | EDICTO del Ayuntamiento de Abrera sobre adjudicacion de un contrato de obras. | Santillana organiza seis debates literarios durante la Feria del Libro de Madrid | MIGUEL GALLARDO Dibujante 'El cómic es un lenguaje muy amplio, pero apenas explotado' | anuncio de la sección tercera de la sala de locontencioso administrativo del tribunal superior de justicia de cataluña sobreadmisión a trámite... | ORDEN de 18 de marzo de 1997 del Departamento de Presidencia y Relaciones Institucionales por la que se dispone el cumplimient... | Resolucion de 3 de mayo de 2002, de la Consejeria de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios, por la que se dispone e...