United States v. Kevin Lee Rowett (8th Cir. 1996)

Federal Circuits, 8th Cir. (January 16, 1996)

Docket number: 95-2062
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/18514015
Id. vLex: VLEX-18514015

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

No. 95-2062

United States of America, Appellee, v. Kevin Lee Rowett, Appellant.

Submitted: January 5, 1996 Filed: January 16, 1996

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Lee Rowett appeals the 240-month sentence imposed by the district court1 following his guilty plea to two counts of distributing cocaine base and three counts of distributing cocaine powder, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Rowett argues first that, in calculating his criminal history category, the district court erred in finding that neither of two pairs of prior concurrent sentences,2 were "related cases" under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2). It is well-settled in this circuit that "two or more sentences imposed at the same time `are not related for purposes of § 4A1.2(a)(2) if the cases proceeded to sentencing under separate docket numbers and there was no formal order of consolidation.'" United States v. Klein, 13 F.3d 1182, 1185 (8th Cir.) (quoting United States v. McComber, 996 F.2d 946, 947 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam)), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2722 (1994). Rowett has not shown either pair of cases proceeded to sentencing under the same docket number or that either pair was formally consolidated.

Rowett argues next that the district court erred by assessing one criminal history point for committing the instant offense less than two years after release from imprisonment. Section 4A1.1(e) states that one point should be added if "the defendant committed the instant offense less than two years after release from imprisonment." Application Note 5 for section 4A1.1 states this assessment can be based on a defendant's relevant conduct. Because Rowett's PSR indicated that he was paroled on January 21, 1991, for the 1989 drug and theft offenses and that his relevant conduct for the instant offense included distributing cocaine in 1991, we conclude the district court properly assessed one point under section 4A1.2(e).

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

second pair of sentences, one was for his July 6, 1992 arrest for driving with a suspended license, and the second was for his August 31, 1992 arrest for driving with a revoked license.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

[UNPUBLISHED]

[1] The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

[2] Of the first pair of sentences, one was for Rowett's March 2, 1989 arrest for possession of a controlled substance, and the second was for his March 29, 1989 arrest for stealing an automobile and removing/defacing the manufacturer's serial number. Of the

Other documents:
United States of America v Willie S King Appellant. 461 F.2d 152 D.C Cir 1972 | Srubar v. Rudd, Rosenberg, 979 F.2d 846 (2nd Cir. 1992) | Krausse v United States Papp v United States. 194 F.2d 440 2nd Cir 1952 | Ustedes también | NOTIFICACION del acuerdo de inicio de procedimiento de revisión y requerimiento de documentación a don Antonio E del Río Moreira. | concurso publico de osakidetza-servicio vasco de salud para la contratación de la adquisición de equipamiento diverso para la dirección médica del hospital ... | RESOLUCION de 27 de noviembre de 2000 de la Direccion General de Juventud y Deporte por la que se hace publica la Orden del Consejero de... | procedimiento artículo 131 l.h., número 625/96, sobre pública subasta. | escrivá rueda una miniserie sobre sorolla | raneda confía en que la biblioteca virtual sea relevante en europa | 10 CFR 71.23 General license Plutonium-beryllium special form material. | case of tribunal supremo - sala cuarta, de lo social, of january 20, 1997