31 USC 3336 - Sec. 3336. Electronic benefit transfer pilot

31 USC - US Code - Title 31: Money and Finance (January 2003)


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/19220617

Id. vLex: VLEX-19220617

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

  (a) The Congress finds that: (1) Electronic benefit transfer (EBT) is a safe, reliable, and economical way to provide benefit payments to individuals who do not have an account at a financial institution. (2) The designation of financial institutions as financial agents of the Federal Government for EBT is an appropriate and reasonable use of the Secretary's authority to designate financial agents. (3) A joint federal-state (!1) EBT system offers convenience and economies of scale for those states (!1) (and their citizens) that wish to deliver (!1) state-administered benefits on a single card by entering into a partnership with the federal (!1) government.(!1) (4) The Secretary's designation of a financial agent to deliver EBT is a specialized service not available through ordinary business channels and may be offered to the states (!1) pursuant to section 6501 et seq. of this title. (b) The Secretary shall continue to carry out the existing EBT pilot to disburse benefit payments electronically to recipients who do not have an account at a financial institution, which shall include the designation of one or more financial institution (!2) as a financial agent of the Government, and the offering to the participating states (!1) of the opportunity to contract with the financial agent selected by the Secretary, as described in the Invitation for Expressions of Interest to Acquire EBT Services for the Southern Alliance of States dated March 9, 1995, as amended as of June 30, 1995, July 7, 1995, and August 1, 1995. (c) The selection and designation of financial agents, the design of the pilot program, and any other matter associated with or related to the EBT pilot described in subsection (b) shall not be subject to judicial review.


(!1) So in original.

Probably should be capitalized.

  (!2) So in original.

Probably should be "institutions".

Other documents:
Dortch v The State. 204 Ga App 822 420 S.E.2d 778 1992 | mitchell copitas plaintiff-appellant v retail clerks international association retail clerks unio... | case of tribunal superior de justicia barcelona cataluna sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of march 12 1999 | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Sevilla Andalucia of June 17 2000 | NOTIFICACION del Servicio Provincial de Zaragoza, a la sociedad Yolvi Hosteleria, S. L., relativa a baja de autorizacion sanitaria. | case of tribunal superior de justicia albacete castilla la mancha sala de lo social of november 06 2001 | Juppe preside el segundo congreso de la UMP en busca de un nuevo lider | Protocole relatif aux aires spécialement protégées et à la diversité biologique en Méditerranée | Resolucion de 2 de agosto de 2005 del Ayun- tamiento de Cedeira A Coruna referente a la c... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Valladolid Castilla y Leon Sala de lo Social of March 07 2005