35 USC 134 - Sec. 134. Appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

35 USC - US Code - Title 35: Patents (January 2003)


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/19226157

Id. vLex: VLEX-19226157

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

  (a) Patent Applicant. - An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) Patent Owner. - A patent owner in any reexamination proceeding may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (c) Third-Party. - A third-party requester in an inter partes proceeding may appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences from the final decision of the primary examiner favorable to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of a patent, having once paid the fee for such appeal.


Historical And Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 57 (R.S. 4909 amended (1) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, Sec. 5, 44 Stat. 1335, 1336, (2) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, Sec. 2, 53 Stat. 1212). Reference to reissues is omitted in view of the general provision in section 251. Minor changes in language are made. AMENDMENTS 2002 - Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(b)(1), substituted "primary examiner" for "administrative patent judge". Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(b)(1), substituted "primary examiner" for "administrative patent judge". Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13106(b), struck out at end "The third-party requester may not appeal the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences." 1999 - Pub. L. 106-113 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally.

Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, having once paid the fee for such appeal." 1984 - Pub. L. 98-622 substituted "Patent Appeals and Interferences" for "Appeals" in section catchline and text.

EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2002 AMENDMENT

Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13106(d), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 141 and 315 of this title] apply with respect to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 2, 2002]."

EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1999 AMENDMENT

Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13202(d), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902, provided that: "The amendments made by section 4605(b), (c), and (e) of the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act, as enacted by section 1000(a)(9) of Public Law 106-113 [amending this section and sections 141 and 145 of this title], shall apply to any reexamination filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or after the date of enactment of Public Law 106-113 [Nov. 29, 1999]." Amendment by Pub. L. 106-113 effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106-113, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.

EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT

Amendment by Pub. L. 98-622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98-622, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.

Section Referred To In Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 141, 145, 154, 306, 315 of this title.

Other documents:
Permits Marine mammals, | airworthiness directives airbus, | Motz v. Landmark First National Bank of Fort Lauderdale., 154 Ga. App. 858, 270 S.E.2d 81 (1980) | Air traffic operating and flight rules etc. High density traffic airports slot allocation and transfer method pol... | Rutledge v Dugger * 831 F.2d 1068 11th Cir 1987 | Auto of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Logrono, La Rioja - Sala de lo Social, of September 04, 2001 | case of tribunal superior de justicia - cataluña nº 12/2002, of july 25, 2002 | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Madrid Sala de lo Social n 336/2007 of May 16 2007 | usa v patrick roosevelt stoutamire 11th cir 2006 | case of audiencia provincial sevilla sección 6ª nº 262/2003 of may 29 2003 | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Madrid - Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo n 946/2003, of September 18, 2003 | Herida una joven en un incendio en Valencia | Frank Johns Petitioner-Appellant v E P Perini Superintendent Marion Correctional Institution Respondent-Appellee. 462 F.2d 130... | case of tribunal superior de justicia - sevilla, andalucia - sala de lo social, of march 05, 2004