4 CFR 28.2 - Jurisdiction.

Code of Federal Regulations - Title 4: Accounts (December 2005)


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/19599985

Id. vLex: VLEX-19599985

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

TITLE 4 - ACCOUNTS

CHAPTER I - GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE

SUBCHAPTER B - GENERAL PROCEDURES

PART 28 - GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD; PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO CLAIMS CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AT THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE

subpart a - PURPOSE, GENERAL DEFINITIONS, AND JURISDICTION

28.2 - Jurisdiction.

  (a) The Board has jurisdiction to hear and decide the following: (1) Proceedings in which the General Counsel seeks to stay a personnel action based upon an alleged prohibited personnel practice that has occurred or is about to occur; (2) Proceedings in which the General Counsel seeks corrective action for an alleged prohibited personnel practice; and (3) Proceedings in which the General Counsel seeks discipline for a GAO employee who has allegedly committed a prohibited personnel practice or who has engaged in prohibited political activity.

  (b) The Board has jurisdiction to hear any action brought by any person or group of persons in the following subject areas: (1) An officer or employee petition involving a removal, suspension for more than 14 days, reduction in grade or pay, or furlough of not more than 30 days; (2) A prohibited personnel practice under 31 U.S.C. 732(b)(2); (3) The appropriateness of a unit of employees for collective bargaining; (4) An election or certification of a collective bargaining representative; (5) A matter appealable to the Board under the labor-management relations program under 31 U.S.C. 732(e), including an unfair labor practice under 31 U.S.C. 732(e)(1); (6) An action involving discrimination prohibited under 31 U.S.C. 732(f)(1); and (7) An issue about GAO personnel which the Comptroller General by regulation decides the Board shall resolve.

  (c) Special jurisdictional rules where matters are covered by a negotiated grievance procedure. If a GAO employee is covered by a collective bargaining agreement containing a negotiated grievance procedure that permits the employee to grieve matters that would otherwise be appealable to the Board, the following special rules apply: (1) Matters involving discrimination, performance-based reduction in grade or removal, or adverse action. If the negotiated grievance procedure permits the employee to grieve matters involving prohibited discrimination (as defined in 28.95), performance-based reduction in grade or removal (as described in 5 U.S.C. 4303) or an adverse action (as described in 5 U.S.C. 7512), then the employee may elect to raise the matter either under the negotiated grievance procedure or under the Board's procedures, but not both. The employee will be deemed to have elected the Board's procedures if the employee files a timely charge with the Board's General Counsel or files a timely written EEO complaint with GAO before filing a timely written grievance.

  (2) Other matters. If the negotiated grievance procedure permits the employee to grieve any matters which would otherwise be appealable to the Board, other than those listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, then those matters may only be raised under the negotiated grievance procedure and not before the Board.

  (3) Board review of final decisions from the negotiated grievance procedure involving discrimination. If an employee elects to pursue a matter involving prohibited discrimination (as defined in 28.95) through the negotiated grievance procedure, the employee may ask the Board to review the final decision of the negotiated grievance procedure as it relates to the issue of discrimination. A petition seeking such review shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board within 20 days of receipt of the final decision of the negotiated grievance procedure. The Board will not review any final decisions of the negotiated grievance procedure other than those where prohibited discrimination was raised as an issue in the grievance.

[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69298, Dec. 12, 2003]

Other documents:
George Vega-Murrillo, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee., 247 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1957) | 45 CFR 1180.45 - Use of consultants in Special Projects. | Solis vs. Pruit (5th Cir. 2000) | Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Elementary and secondary education— E... | 4 CFR 28.2 - Jurisdiction. | Miles de personas claman contra las FARC | Resolución del Servicio Andaluz de Salud por la que se convoca contratación de suministro de equipamiento de Área de Ultrasonido (ecógrafos doppler color, ecógrafos gi... | El Barça se siente eufórico Serra Ferrer alimenta la ilusión de la grada pese a recibir al Mála... | ORDEN de 18 de febrero de 1998, del Consejero de Ordenación del Territorio, Viviend... | Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Defendant... | Solicitud de autorización administrativa de instalación eléctrica