9 CFR 52.2 - Payment of indemnity.

Code of Federal Regulations - Title 9: Animals and Animal Products (December 2005)


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/19609351

Id. vLex: VLEX-19609351

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

TITLE 9 - ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS

CHAPTER I - ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

SUBCHAPTER B - COOPERATIVE CONTROL AND ERADICATION OF LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY DISEASES

PART 52 - SWINE DESTROYED BECAUSE OF PSEUDORABIES

52.2 - Payment of indemnity.

  (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator is authorized to agree on the part of the Department to pay indemnity to the owner of herds of swine destroyed because the herds are known to be infected with pseudorabies, or individual breeding sows destroyed because they are known to be infected with pseudorabies. The amount of indemnity paid, together with the amount for net salvage the owner receives when the animals are slaughtered, shall not exceed the fair market value of the swine. Such swine must be sent directly to slaughter under permit in a conveyance closed with an official seal applied and removed by either an APHIS employee, a State representative, an accredited veterinarian, or an individual authorized for this purpose by an APHIS employee. The swine must be sent to a recognized slaughtering establishment.

  (b) If swine from herds that are destroyed because the herds are known to be infected with pseudorabies are not accepted at a recognized slaughtering establishment, or the owner and an APHIS employee or State representative agree they will not be accepted by a recognized slaughtering establishment, the Administrator is authorized to pay 100 percent of the expenses of the purchase, destruction, and disposition of such swine. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579 0151) [65 FR 20711, Apr. 18, 2000]

Other documents:
USA vs Cardenas 5th Cir 2002 | state v. kolat (ohio 2008) | 55 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 804, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,655 David W. Kypke, Appellant, v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Ap... | Robert H. Crosby, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee., 339 F.2d 743 (D.C. Cir. 1964) | us v under seal 4th cir 2004 | mclaren denuncia insultos racistas contra lewis hamilton en montmeló | Adjustment assistance; applications, determinations, etc.: Sanford North America, | orden de 9 de abril de 2001 del departamento de medio ambiente por la que se formula... | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Lleida, Sección 2ª nº 342/2007, of October 18, 2007