Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Comm'n, 471 U.S. 82 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court, (March 27, 1985)
Docket number: 84-249
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/19976193
Id. vLex: VLEX-19976193
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Search in this document
Document options
RSSU.S. Supreme Court - Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal, 522 U.S. 287 (1998)
U.S. Supreme Court - Dennis v. Higgins, 498 U.S. 439 (1991)
U.S. Supreme Court SPENCER v. SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION, 471 U.S. 82 (1985) 471 U.S. 82
SPENCER ET UX. v. SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA No. 84-249. Argued February 27, 1985 Decided March 27, 1985 281 S. C. 492, 316 S. E. 2d 386, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Henry L. Parr, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Eric B. Amstutz and Frank S. Holleman III. Ray N. Stevens, Senior Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, and Joe L. Allen, Jr., Chief Deputy Attorney General.* [Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the State of Alaska et al. by Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Thomas R. Kiley, First Assistant Attorney General, Judith S. Yogman, Assistant Attorney General, Norman Gorsuch, Attorney General of Alaska, Steve Clark, Attorney General of Arkansas, Duane Woodard, Attorney General of Colorado, Jim Jones, Attorney General of Idaho, Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, David L. Armstrong, Attorney General of Kentucky, Alex W. Rose, Assistant Attorney General, Stephan H. Sachs, Attorney General of Maryland, Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General of Minnesota, Brian McKay, Attorney General of Nevada, Peter W. Mosseau, Acting Attorney General of New Hampshire, Robert O. Wefald, Attorney General of North Dakota, Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Attorney General of Ohio, LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Mark V. Meierhenry, Attorney General of South Dakota; and for the Council of State Governments et al. by Joyce Holmes Benjamin. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case. [Page 471 U.S. 82, 83] Other documents:
c. thomas swatts, et al., plaintiffs-appellants, v. united steelworkers of america, defendant-appellee., 808 f.2d 1221 (7th cir. 1986)
|
visas immigrant and nonimmigrant documentation consular posts abroad affidavi... |
Consolidated Bottling Co. Appellant v Jaco Equipment Corp. Appellee v United... |
Travelers Ins Co v Rowand. 197 F.2d 283 5th Cir 1952
| Case of , of February 12, 2002
| Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Zaragoza, Aragón - Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo nº 2753, of July 12, 2005
| Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Barcelona Cataluña Sala de lo Social of March 22 1999
|
Correccion de errores de la Resolucion de 27 de abril de 2007 de la Direccion General de Calidad Ambiental que modifica la autor... | Primera víctima mortal y nuevo anuncio de secuestro |
joseph j. shavrnoch, plaintiff-appellant, v. clark oil and refining corporation, a wisconsin corporation, defendant-appellee., 726 f.2d 291 (6th cir. 1984)
|
Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., a Corporation, Defend... | empiezan las vacaciones para los mayoresel programa de vacac...
