Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook, 281 U.S. 647 (1930)

U.S. Supreme Court, (June 02, 1930)

Docket number: 2
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20016529
Id. vLex: VLEX-20016529

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Steven D. Willis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. Craig Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 555 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1977)

Constitution of the United States (Annotated) - Section 8: Powers of Congress

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. Antelope, 430 U.S. 641 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - McClanahan v. Arizona Tax Comm'n, 411 U.S. 164 (1973)

U.S. Supreme Court - Kleppe v. New Mexico, 426 U.S. 529 (1976)

U.S. Supreme Court - North Dakota v. United States, 495 U.S. 423 (1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - the Fort Mojave Tribe, By and Through Its Tribal Council in Class Action on Behalf of all Members of Said Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the County of San Bernardino, a Political Subdivision of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee., 543 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1976)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - United States of America, Appellant, v. Franklin Dale Goings and Seth Peter Bad Cob, Appellees., 504 F.2d 809 (8th Cir. 1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. William Theodore Lovely, Appellant., 319 F.2d 673 (4th Cir. 1963)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court SURPLUS TRADING CO. v. COOK, 281 U.S. 647 (1930)

[Page 281 U.S. 647, 658]

listing personal property for assessment. We are led to make this statement because the record suggests, if it does not show, that on that day 21,235 of the blankets purchased by the plaintiff were held by it in a private warehouse in Little Rock, the county seat of Pulaski county, and 64,371 was the number remaining in the government storehouses at Camp Pike. Whether the assessment which was on the whole can be proportionally sustained as to the part in Little Rock so that the plaintiff will be charged with only such portion of the tax as pertains to that part of the blankets is a question of state law on which we intimate no opinion.

The judgment will be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed.

Other documents:
Airworthiness standards Special conditions Boeing Model 747-100/200B/200F/200C/SR/SP/100B/300/100B SUD/400/400D/400F airplanes, | Mabel Sprague (Widow of Frederick Sprague), Claimant-Petitioner, v. Director, Office o... | Willard A. Bronger, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent. Frank E. Kacprowicz, Petition... | applications hearings determinations etc. ohio valley hub llc, | 46 cfr 117.72 personal flotation devices carried in addition to life jackets. | ORDEN de 14 de junio de 2002, del Departamento de Agricultura, por la que se aprueba la convocatoria de ayudas para la mejora de la calidad de la leche... | el asesino de lennon seguirá en prisión al serle denegada la libertad condicional | Resolución do 3 de maio de 2005 da Delegación Provincial da Coruña pola que se autoriza e se aproba o proxecto de execución da instalación ... | edicto de 22 de enero de 2004 sobre un acuerdo de la comisión territorial de urbanismo de lleida refe... | Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1712/1999 der Kommission vom 30. Juli 1999 über die Festsetzung des Umfangs, in dem die im...