Langnes v. Green, 282 U.S. 531 (1931)

U.S. Supreme Court, (February 24, 1931)

Docket number: 38
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20016622
Id. vLex: VLEX-20016622

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Robert Benson, Appellant, v. Bill Armontrout, Appellee., 767 F.2d 454 (8th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Supreme Court - Lake Tankers Corp. v. Henn, 354 U.S. 147 (1957)

U.S. Supreme Court - Swarb v. Lennox, 405 U.S. 191 (1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Sanco, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ford Motor Co., Defendant-Appellee. Sanco, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee, v. Ford Motor Co., Defendant-Cross-Appellant., 771 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed. Cir. - the United States, Appellant, v. Paul M. W. Bruckmann, Appellee. Paul M. W. Bruckmann, Cross-Appellant, v. the United States, Cross-Appellee., 582 F.2d 622 (Fed. Cir. 1978)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Hendricks Johannes Volkenburg, P.P.A., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Nederland-Amerik. Stoomv. Maats, Defendant, Appellee., 336 F.2d 480 (1st Cir. 1964)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Bernell Ray and Armanda Ray, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant., 805 F.2d 552 (5th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - in Re the Complaint of Leroy Rubenstein for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as the Owner of the Pleasure Craft, Billy Boy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Johanna J. Bryant, Defendant-Appellee. No. 75-2081. Summary Calendar. [Fn*], 522 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Tymshare, Inc., Appellant, v. William J. Covell. William J. Covell, Appellant, v. Tymshare, Inc., 727 F.2d 1145 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court LANGNES v. GREEN, 282 U.S. 531 (1931)

[Page 282 U.S. 531, 532]

Messrs. Robert E. Bronson and H. B. Jones, both of Seattle, Wash., for petitioner.

Messrs. Winter S. Martin and Samuel B. Bassett, both of Seattle, Wash ., for respondent.

Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner, as sole owner of the fishing vessel Aloha, on February 24, 1928, brought a proceeding in the federal District Court for the Western District of Washington, praying a limitation of liability under Rev. St. 4283, 4284, 4285 (U. S. C. title 46, 183, 184, 185 (46 USCA 183-185 )), which are copied in the margin. [Footnote 1] It was stipulated by the

[Page 282 U.S. 531, 544]

cided there are, first, whether the defendant is liable at all, and, if so, as to the value of the vessel and her freight, which is the limit of defendant's liability.' See, also, Delaware River Ferry Co. v. Amos (D. C.) 179 F. 756.

Disposition of the matter, so as to allow the action to proceed in the state court, finds warrant in like principles which have been applied in other kinds of cases. Admiralty courts, for example, have complete jurisdiction over suits of a maritime nature between foreigners. Nevertheless, 'the question is one of discretion in every case, and the court will not take cognizance of the case if justice would be as well done by remitting the parties to their home forum.' The Maggie Hammond, 9 Wall. 435, 457; The Belgenland, 114 U.S. 355, 368, 5 S. Ct. 860; Charter Shipping Co. v. Bowring, etc., 281 U.S. 515, 517, 50 S. Ct. 400. See, also, generally, Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca, etc., supra; and compare the opinion of the District Court upon the point in the same case, 224 F. 188, 191. So, while the courts of this country have and may entertain jurisdiction of actions between nonresident foreigners for torts committed in a foreign country, they will exercise such jurisdiction in their discretion and only in special cases. Dewitt v. Buchanan, 54 Barb. (N. Y.) 31, 34. And see, also, National Telephone Manuf. Co. v. Du Bois, 165 Mass. 117, 118, 42 N. E. 510, 30 L. R. A. 628, 52 Am. St. Rep. 503; Harris et al. v. Pullman et al., 84 Ill. 20, 27, 25 Am. Rep. 416.

The decrees of both courts below must be reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Reversed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 Sec. 4283. The liability of the owner of any vessel, for any embezzlement, loss, or destriction, by any person, of any property, goods, or merchandise, shipped or puton board of such vessel, or for any loss, damage, or injury by collision, or for any act, matter, or thing, loss, damage, or forfeiture, done, occasioned, or incurred without the privity, or knowledge of such owner or owners, shall in no case exceed the amount or value of the interest of such owner in such vessel, and her freight then pending.

Sec. 4284. Whenever any such embezzlement, loss, or destribution is suffered by several freighters or owners of goods, wares, merchandise, or any property whatever, on the same voyage, and the whole value of the vessel, and her freight for the voyage, is not sufficient to make compensation to each of them, they shall receive compensation from the owner of the vessel in proportion to their respective losses; and for that purpose the freighters and owners of the property, and the owner of the vessel, or any of them, may take the appropriate proceedings in any court, for the purpose of apportioning the sum for which the owner of the vessel may be liable among the parties entitled thereto.

Sec. 4285. It shall be deemed a sufficient compliance on the part of such owner with the requirements of this Title relating to his liability for any embezzlement, loss, or destruction of any property, goods, or merchandise, if he shall transfer his interest in such vessel and freight, for the benefit of such claimants, to a trustee, to be appointed by any court of competent jurisdiction, to act as such trustee for the person who may prove to be legally entitled thereto; from and after which transfer all claims and proceedings against the owner shall cease.

Other documents:
The Canton Drop Forging & Mfg Co. Employer And International Brotherhood Of Black... | Challenger Inc. Appellant v Robert S Durno Appellee. 227 F.2d 918 5th Cir 1956 | airworthiness directives cessna, | United States v. Schettini (1st Cir. 1998) | Gazprom denuncia que Ucrania consume parte del gas destinado a Europa | Restaurante Nicolas Madrid | case of tribunal superior de justicia comunidad valenciana sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of december 24 2001 | Case of Audiencia Provincial Madrid Seccion 18 n 650/2004 of October 27 2004 | Auto of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Barcelona Cataluña Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo of December 16 2004 | ANUNCIO de 23 de mayo de 2000, de exposicion publica de propuesta de deslinde de vias pecuarias en el termino municipal ... | Instalaciones electricas Resolucion de 10-02-1999 direccion general de desarrollo industrial sobre autorizacion admin... | ORDEN de 1 de octubre de 1999 por la que se convocan ayudas economicas a corporaciones locales capitales de provincia para el desarrollo de programas de prevencion d...