United States v. La Franca, 282 U.S. 568 (1931)

U.S. Supreme Court, (January 27, 1931)

Docket number: 74
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20016628
Id. vLex: VLEX-20016628

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Nona Harding Marigold, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John P. Comeaux, Individually and as Executive Director of the Department of Taxation of the State of Nevada, Defendant-Appellee., 945 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1991)

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 (1989)

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. Tax Comm'n of Miss., 421 U.S. 599 (1975)

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc., 518 U.S. 213 (1996)

U.S. Supreme Court - Maness v. Meyers, 419 U.S. 449 (1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. City of Columbia, Missouri; Harold Boldt, Finance Director, Appellant., 914 F.2d 151 (8th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Supreme Court - Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93 (1997)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Huntington, West Virginia, Defendant-Appellee., 999 F.2d 71 (4th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - in Re: Owen George; in Re: Deborah George, Debtors, Owen George; Deborah George, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Uninsured Employers Fund; Stephen J. Smith, Director of Industrial Relations; Department of Industrial Relations; State of California, Defendants-Appellees., 361 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2004)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. LA FRANCA, 282 U.S. 568 (1931)

[Page 282 U.S. 568, 577]

whether requiring under penalty a return as a retail lquo r dealer, amounting, as it plainly does, to an admission of criminal liability, violates the rule against compulsory self-incrimination. In this situation we do not now feel called upon to consider or decide the point. If the government, in view of the foregoing and of our decision upon the questions in respect of which the writ of certiorari was granted, shall still desire to press its contention, it will be given an opportunity to do so by first presenting it to the trial court.

The judgment of the court of appeals will be affirmed and the cause remanded to the district court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion, without prejudice to the further consideration and determination by the district court of the question of liability in respect of the item of $4.68.

It is so ordered.

Other documents:
nush gjolaj petitioner v bureau of citizenship and immigration services respondent. 468 f.3d 140 2nd cir 2006 | Notice Fourth Circuit I.O.P 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for ... | senior executive service; career positions reserved during 2006; list, | Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for... | case of tribunal superior de justicia malaga andalucia n 956/2003 of may 22 2003 | US v Lewis 4th Cir 2001 | Ciudad de Ceuta Convenio.- Resolución de 3 de septiembre de 2007 de la Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones y para la Sociedad de la Información ... | ¡a belén txikillos! | Railroad services abandonment: Delaware & Hudson Railway Co., | case of tribunal superior de justicia barcelona cataluña sala de lo social of september 01 1999 | La abogada del acusado Solo sospechas debiles | case of audiencia provincial - madrid, seccion 3 n 227/2003, of april 04, 2003 | Se convoca concurso por el procedimiento abierto la adjudicacion de la Asistencia Tecnica Mantenimiento y E...