Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935)

U.S. Supreme Court, (January 07, 1935)

Docket number: 127
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20017635
Id. vLex: VLEX-20017635

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

Code of Federal Regulations - Title 26: Internal Revenue - 26 CFR 301.6111-2 - Confidential corporate tax shelters.

Federal Register - Income taxes: Tax shelter rules II; modification,

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed. Cir. - Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-Appellee., 899 F.2d 1199 (Fed. Cir. 1990)

U.S. Supreme Court - Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc., 529 U.S. 460 (2000)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Sidney Perssion and Caroline Perssion, Husband and Wife, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., 296 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1961)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - Estate of Al J. Schneider, Donald J. Schneider, Et Al., Personal Representatives, and Agnes Schneider, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee., 855 F.2d 435 (7th Cir. 1988) Donald J. Schneider, Et Al., Personal Representatives, and Agnes Schneider, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - James F. Boccardo; Lorraine v. Boccardo, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee., 56 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 1995)

Federal Register - Income taxes, etc.: Tax shelter regulations,

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Mel Dar Corporation, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Coy Burnett and Mildred K. Burnett, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., 309 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1962)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court GREGORY v. HELVERING, 293 U.S. 465 (1935)

[Page 293 U.S. 465, 470]

When that limited function had been exercised, it immediately was put to death.

In these circumstances, the facts speak for themselves and are susceptible of but one interpretation. The whole undertaking, though conducted according to the terms of subdivision (B), was in fact an elaborate and devious form of conveyance masquerading as a corporate reorganization, and nothing else. The rule which excludes from consideration the motive of tax avoidance is not pertinent to the situation, because the transaction upon its face lies outside the plain intent of the statute. To hold otherwise would be to exalt artifice above reality and to deprive the statutory provision in question of all serious purpose.

Judgment affirmed.

Other documents:
bennett v the state. 166 ga app 273 304 s.e.2d 445 1983 | 14 cfr 33.8 - selection of engine power and thrust ratings. | United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Joseph Foley and John Jose... | Chapman Norma L. v Omark Industries a Division of Blount Inc. 867 F.2d 607 1st Cir 1988 | CORRECCION DE ERRATAS en la Orden TIC/484/2003 de 20 de noviembre por la que se establece el calendario de fi... | Case of Tribunal Supremo Sala Primera de lo Civil nº 1313/2002 of December 30 2002 | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Aragon of September 30 1999 | case of tribunal superior de justicia - palmas de gran canaria (las), canarias - sala de lo contencioso-administrativo, of septe... | admitidas las primeras mujeres en las fuerzas de combate alemanas | el dato del pib de estados unidos permite un rebote de las bolsas europeas | Resolucion de 7 de septiembre de 2007 de la Diputacion Provincial de Guadalajara referente a la convocatoria para proveer puesto de ... | NOTIFICACIONS de SANCIONS PER PRESSUMPTES INFRACCIONS de TRaNSIT No havent pog...