United States v. Oregon, 295 U.S. 701 (1935)

U.S. Supreme Court, (June 03, 1935)

Docket number: 13
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20017809
Id. vLex: VLEX-20017809

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. STATE OF OREGON, 295 U.S. 701 (1935)

[Page 295 U.S. 701, 713]

46 31 W. 27.00 chs.; N. 39 45 W. 20.00 chs.; N. 42 15 W. 14.90 chs.; N. 15 15 W. 38.00 chs.; N. 31 15 W. 17.00 chs.; N. 4 43 W. 29.52 chs.; N. 14 W. 14.00 chs.; N. 47 30 E. 16.50 chs.; N. 8 E. 30.00 chs.; N. 31 30 E. 30.09 chs.; N. 24 E. 33.00 chs.; N. 11 E. 30.00 chs.; N. 72 E. 11.00 chs.; N. 82 E. 6.10 chs.; N. 45 E. 18.36 chs.; S. 89 39 E. 22.00 chs.;

Thence, in T. 26 S., R. 29 E., N. 57 E. 30.50 chs.; N. 52 E. 25.50 chs.; North 20.35 chs.;

Thence, in T. 26 S., R. 30 E. (North of Malheur Lake), N. 53 15 E. 46. 22 chs.; N. 66 E. 47.26 chs.; N. 55 15 E. 14.08 chs.; N. 68 30 E. 20.00 chs.; N. 79 15 E. 10.00 chs.; N. 88 15 E. 30.00 chs.; S. 81 E. 10.00 chs.; S. 76 15 E. 21.12 chs.; S. 81 E. 20.00 chs.; S. 82 30 E. 20.00 chs.; S. 80 E. 20.00 chs.; S. 75 30 E. 27.09 chs.; S. 70 E. 38.00 chs.; S. 69 E. 19.85 chs.; S. 64 E. 40.00 chs.; S. 60 E. 51.40 chs.; S. 89 E. 20.39 chs.;

Thence, in a southeasterly direction across unsurveyed land, along the west base of the Sand Reef on the 4,095-foot contour line, a distance of approximately 303.75 chains to the place of beginning.

14. The rights of persons not parties to this suit are not determined. It is not determined whether any part of the meander line boundary is or was in fact a true and correct meander line upon which the lands of such upland owners border, and no reference, here or in the special master's report, to parts of such line shall be taken as an adjudication that the meander line in this respect is the true or correct boundary.

15. The counterclaim of the state of Oregon is hereby dismissed except as to matters determined in paragraphs 4 and 7 of this decree.

16. It is further decreed that each party pay its own costs, and that each party pay one-half of the expenses incurred by the special master, and also one-half of the amount to be fixed by the Court as the compensation of the special master.

Other documents:
14 CFR SFAR NO. 97 - Special Operating Rules for the Conduct of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations using Global Positioning Systems (GPS... | US v Hardy 4th Cir 1996 | National Labor Relations Board Petitioner v Catalina Yachts Respondent. 679 F.2d 180 9th Cir 1982 | Simancas promete crear 250.000 puestos de trabajo | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Zaragoza Aragon Sala de lo Social of December 27 2001 | Telefonica invierte 750 millones en Internet rural | ANUNCIO de la Delegación Provincial de Málaga, para que comparezcan y hagan las alegaciones convenientes doña Dolores Ortiz Acevedo ... | resolucion pre/786/2004 de 25 de marzo por la que se da publicidad al nombramiento de personal eventual del dep... | notificación en extracto a don francisco sánchez lópez y doña mª consuelo muñoz antolí. ...