Douglas v. Willcuts, 296 U.S. 1 (1935)

U.S. Supreme Court, (October 14, 1935)

Docket number: 1
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20017810
Id. vLex: VLEX-20017810

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - in the Matter of Richard L. Kochell, Debtor. Appeal of United States of America., 804 F.2d 84 (7th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Supreme Court - Commissioner v. Lester, 366 U.S. 299 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court - Commissioner v. Kowalski, 434 U.S. 77 (1977)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Estate of Craig R. Sheaffer, Deceased, Walter A. Sheaffer, Ii, and John D. Shaeffer, Executors, and Virginia D. Sheaffer, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., 313 F.2d 738 (8th Cir. 1963)

U.S. Supreme Court - Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A., 405 U.S. 394 (1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - James M. Pierce Corporation, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., 326 F.2d 67 (8th Cir. 1964)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Edna Bennett Hirst, Appellee, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellant., 572 F.2d 427 (4th Cir. 1978)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - in the Matter of Roger Roy Larson and Joan Rosemary Larson, Debtors-Appellants., 862 F.2d 112 (7th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fed. Cir. - W.L. Hardee and Elnora L. Hardee, Appellants, v. the United States, Appellee., 708 F.2d 661 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court DOUGLAS v. WILLCUTS, 296 U.S. 1 (1935)

[Page 296 U.S. 1, 10]

trust, attributable to the creator of the trust and accordingly taxable to him. These provisions have appropriate reference to cases where the income of the trust is no longer to be regarded as that of the settlor, and we find no warrant for a constructioin which would preclude the laying of the tax against the one who through the discharge of his obligation enjoys the benefit of the income as though he had personally received it.

The decision in Helvering v. Butterworth, 290 U.S. 365, 54 S.Ct. 221, 222, is not opposed. There the trust was testamentary and the only question was with respect to the liability for the tax as between the trustee and the beneficiary. The Court observed that 'the evident general purpose of the statute was to tax in some way the whole income of all trust estates.' The decision has no application to a case where the income is still taxable to the grantor. Nor are the provisions of the statutes (Revenue Act 1926, 219(h), 26 USCA 167 note; Revenue Act 1928 , 167, 26 USCA 167 note) defining instances in which the grantor remains taxable, as in case of certain reservations for his benefit or provisions for the payment of premiums upon policies of insurance on his life, to be regarded as excluding instances not specified, where in contemplation of law the income remains in substance that of the grantor. No such exclusion is expressed and we see no ground for implying it.

The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Decree affirmed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 The text of these provisions is as follows:'8601. Trustee of alimony-The court may appoint trustees, whenever it is deemed expedient, to receive any money ordered to be paid to the wife, upon trust to invest the same, and pay over the income for the support of the wife, or of the wife and minor children of the parties, or any of them, in such manner as the court shall direct, or to pay over to the wife the principal sum in such proportions and at such times as the court shall order, regard being had in all such cases to the situation and circumstances of such wife, and the children if there are any, provided for in the order; and such trustees shall give such bond, as the court shall require, for the faithful performance of their trust.''8602. Property of husband-Permanent alimony-Upon a divorce for any cause except that of adultery committed by the wife, if the estate and property restored or awarded to her is insufficient for the suitable support of herself and such children of the marriage as shall be committed to her care and custody, or if there is no such estate and property, the court may further order and decree to her such part of the personal and real estate of the husband, not exceeding in value one-third thereof, as it deems just and reasonable, having regard to the ability of the husband, the character and situation of the parties, and all other circumstances of the case.

The court may also, in the cases provided for in this section, decree to the wife such alimony out of the estate, earnings, and income of the husband as it may deem just and reasonable, having regard to the ability of the husband, the character and situation of the parties, and other circumstances of the case, and may by its decree make the same a specific lien upon any specified parcels of his real estate, or authorize its enforcement by execution against his property, real and personal; but the aggregate award and allowance made to the wife from the estate of the husband under this section shall not in any case exceed in present value one-third of the personal estate, earnings, and income of the husband, and one-third in value of his real estate.''8603. Order for alimony, etc., revised-After an order or decree for alimony, or other allowance for the wife and children, or either of them, or for the appointment of trustees to receive and hold any property for the use of the wife or children, the court, from time to time, on petition of either of the parties, may revise and alter such order or decree respecting the amount of such alimony or allowance, and the payment thereof, and also respecting the appropriation and payment of the principal and income of the property so held in trust, and may make any order respecting any of the said matters which it might have made in the original action.'

Other documents:
Buffalo Bayou Transportation Company Et Al. Appellants v United States of America Appellee. 375 F.2d 675 5th Cir 1967 | Banks v The State. 185 Ga App 851 366 S.E.2d 228 1988 | John Mihalchak, Appellant, v. American Dredging Company., 266 F.2d 875 (3rd Cir. 1959) | ANUNCIO de emplazamiento de interesados en relación con la liquidación y recaudación de impuestos. | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Valladolid Castilla y León Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo of February 18 1999 | Marks v Esperdy 377 U.S 214 < I> per curiam < /I> 1964 | united states v. bisceglia, 420 u.s. 141 (1975) | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Madrid Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo n 1583/2003 of December 17 2003 | Notice Eighth Circuit Rule 28A K Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides that no Party May... | ANUNCIO por el que se ha pública la adjudicación de un contrato de suministros. | RESOLUCION de 23 de julio de 1998, por la que se fija la fecha para la redaccion de actas previas a la o... | anuncios de audiencias, tribunales, juzgados y requisitorias