U.S. Supreme Court, (December 07, 1936)
Docket number: 226, 372
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/20018329
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018329
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - Jordan v. De George, 341 U.S. 223 (1951)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Cir. - Preterm, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Michael S. Dukakis Et Al., Defendants, Appellees. Parents' Aid Society, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Alexander E. Sharp Ii, Defendant, Appellant. Parents' Aid Society, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Alexander E. Sharp Ii, Defendant, Appellee., 591 F.2d 121 (1st Cir. 1979) Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Michael S. Dukakis Et Al., Defendants, Appellees. Parents' Aid Society, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Alexander E. Sharp Ii, Defendant, Appellant. Parents' Aid Society, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Alexander E. Sharp Ii, Defendant, Appellee.
U.S. Supreme Court OLD DEARBORN DISTRIBUTING CO. v. SEAGRAM-DISTILLERS CORPORATION, 299 U.S. 183 (1936)
299 U.S. 183 OLD DEARBORN DISTRIBUTING CO. v. SEAGRAM-DISTILLERS CORPORATION. McNEIL v. JOSEPH TRINER CORPORATION. Nos. 226, 372. Argued Nov. 12, 13, 1936. Decided Dec. 7, 1936. Appeals from the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.[ Old Dearborn Distributing Co v. Seagram-Distillers Corporation 299 U.S. 183 (1936) ] [Page 299 U.S. 183, 198] 'immigrant agents' engaged in hiring laborers to be employed beyond the limits of a state and persons engaged in the business of hiring for labor within the state; between sugar refiners who produce the sugar and those who purchase it. Other illustrations of a similar character might be cited. But it is unnecessary to pursue the subject further; for, since the sole purpose of the present law is to afford a legitimate remedy for an injury to the good will which results from the use of trade-marks, brands, or names, it is obvious that its provisions would be wholly inapplicable to goods which are unmarked. Decrees affirmed. Mr. Justice STONE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.