Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Lutz, 299 U.S. 300 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1936)
U.S. Supreme Court, (December 07, 1936)
Docket number: 501
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/20018349
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018349
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Search in this document
Document options
RSSU.S. Supreme Court - Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm'n, 432 U.S. 333 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court KROGER GROCERY & BAKING CO. v. LUTZ, 299 U.S. 300 (1936)
[Page 299 U.S. 300, 302] In order to support its contention, complainant seeks to capitalize its earnings and thus to arrive at the value of the part of the business affected by the order. But that basis of ascertaining a capital loss is not available to complainant here, as the statute, and with it the order, expire by limitation on July 1, 1937. The hurt by reason of the regulation does not appear to be greater than the loss sustained while the statute is in operation. The decree of the District Court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. Mr. Justice STONE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Other documents:
In re Gerardi, 17 F.3d 1427 (2nd Cir. 1994)
|
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Edwards, 271 U.S. 109 (1926)
|
James P Merchant Plaintiff Appellee v Philip Henry Ruhle Defendant Appellant. 740 F.2d 86 1st Cir 1984
| case of tribunal superior de justicia sevilla andalucía sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of june 13 2005
| case of tribunal supremo sala segunda de lo penal nº 458/2000 of march 27 2000
| Case of Audiencia Provincial Madrid nº 373/1999 of September 07 1999
|
ORDEN de 29 de septiembre de 1986 de la Consejeria de Agricultura Ganaderia y Montes por la que se concede el Titul... |
State v. Scott (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1268
| case of tribunal superior de justicia madrid sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of june 09 2004
| Case of Audiencia Nacional Sala de lo Contencioso of February 06 2007
|
acuerdo de 21 de diciembre de 1999, de la junta de gobierno del
institut...
