Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Scarlett, 300 U.S. 471 (1937)

U.S. Supreme Court, (March 29, 1937)

Docket number: 505
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20018474
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018474

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Robert D. Jordan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Southern Railway Company, Defendant-Appellant., 970 F.2d 1350 (4th Cir. 1992)

Georgia Court Of Appeals - Kelson v. Central of Georgia Railroad Company., 234 Ga. App. 200, 505 S.E.2d 803 (1998)

U.S. Supreme Court - Batterton v. Francis, 432 U.S. 416 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 U.S. 519 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Edward G. Sheehy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Defendant-Appellee., 631 F.2d 649 (9th Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - United States of America v. Walter Dunlap & Sons, Inc., Appellant in 85-1671. United States of America v. New Holland Sales Stables, Inc., Appellant in 85-1673., 800 F.2d 1232 (3rd Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Lester D. King, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Defendant-Appellee., 855 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir. 1988)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Ethel and Don Martin, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant-Appellee., 639 F.2d 647 (10th Cir. 1981)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court ATCHISON, T. & S.F. RY. CO. V. SCARLETT , 300 U.S. 471 (1937)

300 U.S. 471

ATCHISON, T. & S.F. RY. CO.v. SCARLETT. * No. 505.

Argued March 3, 1937.Decided March 29, 1937.

Messrs. H. K. Lockwood and Robert Brennan, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

[ Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. Scarlett 300 U.S. 471 (1937) ]

[Page 300 U.S. 471 , 475]

was a contrivance separate and distinct from the ladder, designed and used for a purpose entirely apart from the use of that appliance. The right of recovery, if any, must therefore rest upon the effect of the near proximity of the ladder to the rod, neither being in itself defective. The law to be applied to that situation is the common-law rule of negligence, and not the inflexible rule of the Safety Appliance Act; and the questions to be answered are whether the two appliances were maintained in such relation to one another as to constitute negligence on the part of the company and, if so, whether Scarlett assumed the risk. Ford v. New York, N. H. & H.R. Co., supra; Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Benson, 352 Ill. 195, 199, 185 N.E. 244; Slater v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 146 Minn. 390, 392, 393, 178 N.W. 813. In that view, Scarlett in abandoning his claim under the common-law rule of negligence abandoned the only possible ground of recovery.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Footnotes

[Footnote *] Rehearing denied 301 U.S. 712, 81 L.Ed. Ä-.

[Footnote *] Section 2, so far as pertinent, provides that '* * * all cars requiring secure ladders and secure running boards shall be equipped with such ladders and running boards, and all cars having ladders shall also be equipped with secure handholds or grab irons on their roofs at the tops of such ladders.'

Section 3 requires the Interstate Commerce Commission, within a time fixed, to designate the number, dimensions, location and manner of application of the appliances provided for in the foregoing section. And these designations were to 'remain as the standards of equipment to be used on all cars subject to the provisions of this Act (chapter), unless changed by an order of said Interstate Commerce Commission.'

Other documents:
United States v Duggan. 210 F.2d 926 8th Cir 1954 | Howard Jarvis an Individual the Conservative Caucus Inc. a Virginia Nonprofit Corporation Plaintiffs-Appellants v Donald T Regan Secretary of the United States Treasury ... | USA v Philip Wayne Mathenia 11th Cir 2005 | 42 USC 8531 - Sec. 8531. Study and report | Gays y Lesbianas convocan un acto de apoyo al matrimonio homosexual horas antes de la... | Un pinche pastelero llamado Hô Chi Minh | resolucion de 15 de diciembre de 2004 de la subsecretaria por la que se da publicidad al convenio marco de colaboracion entre el ministerio de agricultura pesca y a... | Confederacion Hidrografica del Ebro - NOTA-ANUNCIO | procedimiento divorcio 932/99. | 45 usc 823 sec 823 administration of direct loans and loan guarantees | Solicitud de legalización de una industria de manufacturas de protección para el trabajo | ANUNCIO sobre aprobación inicial de la Modificación Puntual núm 6 de las Normas Su... | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Valencia, Sección 10ª nº 338/2008, of May 27, 2008