United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324 (1937)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 03, 1937)

Docket number: 532
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20018528
Id. vLex: VLEX-20018528

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Gopalakrishnan N. Mangattu, Derryl F. Remedioa, and Thaluthara K. Francis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. M/V Ibn Hayyan, Et Al., Defendants, United Arab Shipping Co. (S.A.G.), and M/V Ibn Al Atheer, Defendants-Appellees., 35 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 1994)

Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal - The Market-Participant Exception And The Dormant Foreign Commerce Clause

Constitution of the United States (Annotated) - Section 2: Powers and Duties of the President

U.S. Supreme Court - First Nat. City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759 (1972)

U.S. Supreme Court - Weinberger v. Rossi, 456 U.S. 25 (1982)

U.S. Supreme Court - American Ins. Assn. v. Garamendi, 539 U.S. 396 (2003)

U.S. Supreme Court - Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, 526 U.S. 172 (1999)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Anthony M. Rossi Et Al., Appellants, v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense Et Al., Appellees., 642 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1980)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Sylvia Molitch, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. Irish International Airlines, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant., 436 F.2d 42 (2nd Cir. 1970)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. BELMONT, 301 U.S. 324 (1937)

[Page 301 U.S. 324, 337]

is to do more than the Soviet government could have done after diplomatic recognition-that is, collect the claims in conformity with those laws. Cf. Todok v. Union State Bank, , 50 S.Ct. 363.

As respondent debtor may not challenge the effect of the assignment to the United States, the judgment is rightly reversed. But as the reversal is without prejudice to the rights of any other parties to intervene, they should be left free to assert, by intervention or other appropriate procedure, such claims with respect to the amount due as are in accordance with the laws and policy of New York. There is no occasion to say anything now which can be taken to foreclose the assertion by such claimants of their rights under New York law.

Mr. Justice BRANDEIS and Mr. Justice CARDOZO concur in this opinion.

Other documents:
7 usc 3413 sec 3413 certification of organizations | Jason Beshers v. Scott Patrick Harrison (11th Cir. 2007) | Harry A. Blachman, as a Taxpayer, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Erieview Corporation, City... | no oposicion a una concentracion notificada (asunto n comp/m.3570 piaggio/aprilia) | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Madrid - Sala de lo Social n 665/2007, of July 18, 2007 | como 'reducir' a un colega y salir airoso del intento | La mejor forma de luchar por unos intereses no es detrás de una pancarta | Cambiar de hábitos | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Madrid, Sección 15ª nº 404/2007, of October 10...