Honeyman v. Jacobs, 306 U.S. 539 (1939)

U.S. Supreme Court, (April 17, 1939)

Docket number: 465
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20019158
Id. vLex: VLEX-20019158

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

Constitution of the United States (Annotated) - Section 10: Powers Denied to the States

U.S. Supreme Court - United States Trust Co. of N. Y. v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1 (1977)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court HONEYMAN v. JACOBS, 306 U.S. 539 (1939)

[Page 306 U.S. 539, 545]

with that in equity'. And that did 'not impair the obligation of the contract'.

We reach a similar result here upon the same ground-that under the finding of the state court the mortgagee has obtained satisfaction of his debt and that the denial by the statute of a further recovery does not violate the constitutional provision.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 Section 1083-a, provides:'1083-a. Limitation Upon Deficiency Judgments During Emergency Period. No judgment shall be granted for any residue of the debt remaining unsatisfied as prescribed by the preceding section where the mortgaged property shall be sold during the emergency, except as herein provided. Simultaneously with the making of a motion for an order confirming the sale or in any event within ninety days after the date of the sale, the party to whom such residue shall be owing may make a motion in the action for leave to enter a deficiency judgment upon notice to the party against whom such judgment is sought or the attorney o shall have appeared for such party in such action. Such notice shall be served personally or in such other manner as the court may direct. Upon such motion the court, whether or not the respondent appears, shall determine, upon affidavit or otherwise as it shall direct, the fair and reasonable market value of the mortgaged premises as of the date of sale or such nearest earlier date as there shall have been any market value thereof and shall make an order directing the entry of a deficiency judgment. Such deficiency judgment shall be for an amount equal to the sum of the amount owing by the party liable as determined by the judgment with interest, plus the amount owing on all prior liens and encumbrances with interest, plus cost and disbursements of the action including the referee's fee and disbursements, less the market value as determined by the court or the sale price of the property whichever shall be the higher. If no motion for a deficiency judgment shall be made as herein prescribed the proceeds of the sale regardless of amount shall be deemed to be in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt and no right to recover any deficiency in any action or proceeding shall exist'.

Other documents:
USA vs. Cuellar (5th Cir. 2003) | Social security benefits Federal old age survivors and disability insurance— Employer identification numbers for State an... | 7 CFR 947.51 - Recommendations for regulations. | 7 USC 2612 - Sec. 2612. Definitions | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Madrid Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo of January 23 1999 | Reglamento (CE) nº 476/2005 de la Comisión, de 23 de marzo de 2005, por el que se fija la restitución máxima por exportación para la... | EDICTO del Ayuntamiento de Gelida, sobre contratacion de personal. | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Cadiz, Seccion 8 n 3/2007, of January 11, 2007 | Airworthiness Directives: Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER Series Airplanes | case of audiencia provincial madrid sección 25ª nº 599/2007 of december 27 2007