William Jameson &amp; Co. v. Morgenthau, 307 U.S. 171 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1939)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 15, 1939)

Docket number: 717
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20019202
Id. vLex: VLEX-20019202

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Wine Industry of Florida, Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. G. William Miller, Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 609 F.2d 1167 (5th Cir. 1980)

Constitution of the United States (Annotated) - Twenty-First Amendment: Repeal Of The Eighteenth Amendment

U.S. Supreme Court - Mobay Chemical Corp. v. Costle, 439 U.S. 320 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1979)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - Juan Rigores Sardino, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, Defendants-Appellees., 361 F.2d 106 (2nd Cir. 1966)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - National Student Association, Inc., Et Al., Appellants, v. Lewis B. Hershey, Appellee., 412 F.2d 1103 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court WILLIAM JAMESON & CO., INC. v. MORGENTHAU, 307 U.S. 171 (1939)

[Page 307 U.S. 171, 174]

direct appeal should lie to this Court when administrative action and not the Act of Congress is assailed.

While we are of the opinion that the Court is without jurisdiction to review the merits on this appeal, the Court does have jurisdiction to make such corrective order as may be appropriate to the enforcement of the limitations$ which Section 3 imposes, and in the circumstances disclosed the appropriate action is to vacate the decree below and to remand the cause to the District Court for further proceedings to be taken independently of Section 3 of the Act of August 24, 1937. See Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., , 54 S.Ct. 565; Oklahoma Gas Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co., 292 U.S. 386, 392, 54 S.Ct. 732, 734.

It is so ordered.

Decree vacated.

Other documents:
7 USC 361 - Sec. 361. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, Sec. 2, 69 Stat. 674 | Substantial Evidence Basis For Reinstating Jury Verdict | USA vs Martinez 5th Cir 2000 | stephen a. gerow, plaintiff-appellant, v. rohm & haas company and morton international, inc., defendants-appellees., 30... | Resuelva correctamente las definiciones y traslade cada letra de las soluciones al panel exterior. | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Alicante, Seccion 5 n 101/2007, of March 15, 2007 | 19 cfr 146.53 - shortages and overages. | edicto correspondiente a las personas encausadas en expedientes sancionadores seguidos en esta delegacion del gobierno. exptes.: 1858... | Rosa Aurora Sabido Valdivia Petitioner v Alberto R Gonzales Attorney General * Respondent. 423 F.3d 1144 10th Cir 2005 | Plazo para el pago de riegos realizados en la zona regable de Montes de Cierzo | USA vs Andrus 5th Cir 1999 | case of tribunal superior de justicia - comunidad valenciana - sala de lo contencioso-administrativo, of july 11, 2003