Georgia v. South Carolina, 259 U.S. 572 (1922)

U.S. Supreme Court, (June 05, 1922)

Docket number: 16, O
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20020650
Id. vLex: VLEX-20020650

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Georgia v. South Carolina, 497 U.S. 376 (1990)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court STATE OF GEORGIA v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 259 U.S. 572 (1922)

259 U.S. 572

STATE OF GEORGIA v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 16, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 5, 1922

Form of Decree Submitted May 15, 1922.

Decree declaring location of interstate boundary.

This cause came on to be heard by this court, and for the purpose of carrying into effect the conclusions of the court as stated in its opinion herein. 257 U.S. 516, 42 Sup. Ct. 173.

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the boundary between the states of Georgia and South Carolina is and shall be the rivers Savannah, Tugaloo, and Chattooga to the point where the latter river touches the North Carolina line at the thirty-fifth parallel of north latitude, and the location of the boundary line between said states is hereby established and declared to be as set forth in the opinion of the court as follows:

First. Where there are no islands in the boundary rivers the location of the line between the two states is on the water midway between the main banks of the river when water is at ordinary stage.

Second. Where there are islands, the line is midway between the island bank and the South Carolina shore when the water is at ordinary stage.

Third. That all islands formed by nature in the Chattooga river are reserved to Georgia as completely as are those in the Savannah and Tugaloo rivers.

Fourth. That the parties to this suit may at any time, by mutual consent, locate and monument the boundary line in any part of the boundary rivers in accordance with the provisions of this decree.

It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the costs of this suit shall be equally divided between the said

[Page 259 U.S. 572, 573]

two states and that the clerk of this court shall forthwith transmit to the chief magistrates of the states of Georgia and South Carolina copies of this decree duly authenticated under the seal of the court.

Other documents:
Application of Melvin F. Kiser for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Melvin F. Kiser, Appellant., 419 F.2d 1134 (... | o brien michael v holland robert franklin county prison eyler deputy warden sgt burns levine mary 884 f.2... | 49 usc 21106 sec 21106 limitations on employee sleeping quarters | US v Holt 4th Cir 2007 | resolucion de nombramiento de funcionarios de carrera del cuerpo de diplomados y tecnicos medios e... | United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel R. Williams, Defendant-Appellant., 356 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2004) | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Caceres Extremadura Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo of June 10 2005 | El penúltimo encierro de 'Sanse' termina con siete heridos | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Cataluna, of December 13, 1999 | Nota - Anuncio | George H. Clay, Trustee and Securities Investor Protection Corp., Appellees, v. Traders Bank of Kansas City, Appellant., 708 F.2d 1347 (8th Cir. 1983)