Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Knox, 277 U.S. 218 (1928)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 14, 1928)

Docket number: 288
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20026088
Id. vLex: VLEX-20026088

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Gurley v. Rhoden, 421 U.S. 200 (1975)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - Barbara Brown, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Mark Brown; Herman Brown, Father and Parent of Robert Mark Brown; Sharon Schaub, Judy Grove, W. Herman Brown, Paula Brown, Brothers and Sisters of Robert Mark Brown, Appellants, v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Appellee., 703 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir. 1983)

Constitution of the United States (Annotated) - Article VI: Prior Debts, National Supremacy, And Oaths Of Office

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. County of Fresno, 429 U.S. 452 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court - United States v. New Mexico, 455 U.S. 720 (1982)

U.S. Supreme Court - Massachusetts v. United States, 435 U.S. 444 (1978)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Cir. - United States of America Appellant, v. State of New Jersey; Violent Crimes Compensation Board, Appellees., 831 F.2d 458 (3rd Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Federal Express Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. California Public Utilities Commission; Stanley W. Hulett; Donald Vial; Frederick R. Duda; John B. Ohanian; G. Michael Wilk; Victor Weiser; Norman Kelley, Defendants-Appellees., 936 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir. 1991)

U.S. Supreme Court - Kelo v. New London, 545 U.S. ___ (2005)

U.S. Supreme Court - South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court PANHANDLE OIL CO. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EX REL. KNOX, 277 U.S. 218 (1928)

[Page 277 U.S. 218, 226]

from which it is taken, and to that extent diminishes the subject upon which federal taxes may be laid. The States are, and they must ever be, coexistent with the national government. Neither may destroy the other. Hence the federal Constitution must receive a practical construction. Its limitations and its implied prohibitions must not be extended so far as to destroy the necessary powers of the States, or prevent their efficient exercise.'

Mr. Justice STONE concurs in these views.

Other documents:
Neal v Insurance Company of North America Et Al. 134 Ga App 854 216 S.E.2d 626 1975 | united states of america, appellee, v. dennis wellington, defendant-appellant., 417 f.3d 284 (2nd cir. 2005) | Rosetta Sumter v Saybolt Inc. Gilbert F Casellas Chairman U.S Equal Employment Opp Comm ... | RESOLUCION de 16 de Diciembre de 1983, del Departamento de Política Territorial y Transportes en relación con ... | case of tribunal superior de justicia granada andalucía sala de lo social of december 22 1999 | Hector Alterio se mete en la piel del pintor atormentado de 'El tunel' | 'Es importante que las novelas hagan comprender la historia' | s ha intentat dur a terme les notificacions per correu certificat amb justificant de recepcio i no ha estat possible ... | Resolución de la Mesa de Contratación de la Dirección General de Armamento y Material anunciando adjudicación del expediente número 100303003700. | Proffitt (Raymond), Turner (Joseph) v. Lower Bucks County Joint Municipal Authority, 908 F.2d 963 (3rd Cir. 1990)