U.S. Supreme Court, (May 20, 1929)
Docket number: 481
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/20026340
Id. vLex: VLEX-20026340
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Supreme Court - National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 510 U.S. 249 (1994)
U.S. Supreme Court - INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001)
U.S. Supreme Court - Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)
U.S. Supreme Court LUCAS v. ALEXANDER, 279 U.S. 573 (1929)
[Page 279 U.S. 573, 581] each policy, for the former $50,000 and for the latter $10,398.50, which, taken together, made up the total payment received by the taxpayer on each policy. They constitute a complete record and determination of the actual economic gain annually accruing upon the policies which was ultimately realized by the taxpayer, and they provide an adequate basis for ascertaining the proportion of the total value realized which had accrued on March 1, 1913. The sum of the insurance reserve liability and the dividend accumulations provisionally apportioned to the two policies on March 1, 1913, their accrued value on that date, was $94,800. As that valuation is larger than that found by either of the lower courts and is supported by reliable data, we may, in the absence of other evidence, accept it as sufficiently establishing that the value found below was not more than that required to be ascertained by the statute, and so did not prejudice the rights of petitioner. It is unnecessary to consider the question mooted whether upon other evidence, not here presented, a larger value as of March 1, 1913, might have been found. The court below, by discounting the total estimated value of the policies at their maturity at 4 per cent., arrived at a rough approximation of their accrued value on that date. This method, however, did not ascertain that value or the taxable gain with accuracy, since it was based on an assumed instead of the actual value of the policies at maturity. It discounted the assumed value at a flat rate of interest instead of at that actually earned, and it left out of account savings from estimated expenses and death losses which, as well as actual interest earned, were taken into account in determining dividend accumulations annually ascertained and credited to the policies on the books of the company. But, as the accuracy of the computation is not questioned here, and as it gave a result of which petitioner cannot complaint, the judgment will be Affirmed.