Lucas v. Alexander, 279 U.S. 573 (1929)

U.S. Supreme Court, (May 20, 1929)

Docket number: 481
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20026340
Id. vLex: VLEX-20026340

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - George E. Farrell, as Administrator de Bonis Non of the Estate of Wyand F. Doerner, Jr., Deceased, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., the Boeing Company and United States of America, Defendants, and Rapidair, Inc., and Lanseair, Inc., Defendants-Appellees., 411 F.2d 812 (2nd Cir. 1969)

U.S. Supreme Court - National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 510 U.S. 249 (1994)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Scott Bradley, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Charles M. Mann, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. George A. Rose, Appellant., 418 F.2d 688 (4th Cir. 1969)

U.S. Supreme Court - INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Denneth Bass, Defendant-Appellant., 434 F.2d 1296 (2nd Cir. 1970)

U.S. Supreme Court - Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Joseph C. Frady, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee. Richard A. Gordon, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee., 348 F.2d 84 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Cordelia Kelsey, Infant, By Her Parent, Louise Kelsey, Et Al., Appellants, v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Et Al., 498 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Thomas B. Cross, Appellant, v. David W. Harris, Appellee., 418 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

Text:

U.S. Supreme Court LUCAS v. ALEXANDER, 279 U.S. 573 (1929)

[Page 279 U.S. 573, 581]

each policy, for the former $50,000 and for the latter $10,398.50, which, taken together, made up the total payment received by the taxpayer on each policy. They constitute a complete record and determination of the actual economic gain annually accruing upon the policies which was ultimately realized by the taxpayer, and they provide an adequate basis for ascertaining the proportion of the total value realized which had accrued on March 1, 1913. The sum of the insurance reserve liability and the dividend accumulations provisionally apportioned to the two policies on March 1, 1913, their accrued value on that date, was $94,800. As that valuation is larger than that found by either of the lower courts and is supported by reliable data, we may, in the absence of other evidence, accept it as sufficiently establishing that the value found below was not more than that required to be ascertained by the statute, and so did not prejudice the rights of petitioner. It is unnecessary to consider the question mooted whether upon other evidence, not here presented, a larger value as of March 1, 1913, might have been found.

The court below, by discounting the total estimated value of the policies at their maturity at 4 per cent., arrived at a rough approximation of their accrued value on that date. This method, however, did not ascertain that value or the taxable gain with accuracy, since it was based on an assumed instead of the actual value of the policies at maturity. It discounted the assumed value at a flat rate of interest instead of at that actually earned, and it left out of account savings from estimated expenses and death losses which, as well as actual interest earned, were taken into account in determining dividend accumulations annually ascertained and credited to the policies on the books of the company. But, as the accuracy of the computation is not questioned here, and as it gave a result of which petitioner cannot complaint, the judgment will be

Affirmed.

Other documents:
Federal Dairy Co. Inc. Employer And Bakery And Food Drivers Warehousemen And Helpers Local Union #64 Intern... | Coleman Harper Bell Appellant v United States of America Appellee. 375 F.2d 763 5th Cir 1967 | 20 CFR 631.41 - Allowable State activities. | auto of audiencia provincial - madrid, sección 15ª nº 4/2004, of january 07, 2004 | Collective Agreement of Saint-Gobain Cristaleria, S.A., Normativa Estatal |   97/283/CE: Decisión de la Comisión de 21 de abril de 1997 sobre los métodos de medición armonizados par... | Case of Audiencia Provincial Lleida Seccion 2 n 36/2008 of February 01 2008 | Reglement CE n 1924/2001 de la Commission du 28 septembre 2001 fixant les taux de restitut... | ORDEN de 27 de marzo de 2000 por la que se conceden ayudas para participar en la actividad de Escuelas Viajeras de 2000. | Los colegios públicos abrirán los festivos y en vacaciones a partir del próximo enero