Omaha &amp; Council Bluffs Street R. Co. v. ICC, 222 U.S. 582 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1911)

U.S. Supreme Court, (November 06, 1911)

Docket number: 846
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20027698
Id. vLex: VLEX-20027698

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

U.S. Supreme Court OMAHA & C B ST R. CO. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, 222 U.S. 582 (1911)

222 U.S. 582

OMAHA & COUNCIL BLUFFS STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION et al. No. 846.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 6, 1911

Mr. John Lee Webster for appellants.

The Attorney General, Blackburn Esterline, and C. W. Needham for appellees.

[Page 222 U.S. 582, 583]

Per Curiam:

Upon the authority of U. S. Rev. Stat. 716; Ex parte Milwaukee & M. R. Co. 5 Wall. 188, 18 L. ed. 676; Leonard v. Ozark Land Co. 115 U.S. 465, 468, 29 S. L. ed. 445, 446, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 127; Re Claasen, 140 U.S. 200, 207, 35 S. L. ed. 409, 412, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 735; Re McKenzie, 180 U.S. 536, 549, 45 S. L. ed. 657, 662, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 468; United States v. Shipp, 203 U.S. 563, 573, 51 S. L. ed. 319, 323, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 165, 8 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 265; and upon full consideration of the facts bearing upon the propriety of the appellants' motion for an order to maintain the status quo pending this appeal, it is ordered that the enforcement of the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered November 27, 1909, and drawn in question in this case, be, and it is, suspended and enjoined during the pendency of this appeal, upon condition that within ten days herefrom the appellants execute unto the Interstate Commerce Commission and file in this cause a good and sufficient bond in the sum of $10,000, with sureties to be approved by the clerk of this court, and conditioned that the appellants will promptly pay any and all damages which may be suffered by their several passengers and intended passengers by reason of the granting or continuance of this order if it is adjudged ultimately that the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, drawn in question in this case, is a valid one.

Other documents:
mcleod vs. thibodeaux (5th cir. 2002) | usa vs. bullock (5th cir. 2006) | 5 CFR 919.635 - May the OPM settle a debarment or suspension action? | El velocista que nadie quería | anunci de l ajuntament de torredembarra sobre aprovació d un projecte de reglament. | El coreografo Mats Ek recibe manana el premio del Festival Danza Valenciana | N.I.G. 07033 1 0400231/2000 Procedimiento Juicio Ejecutivo 58/2000 Sobre Otras Materias De D/na Banca Catalana S.A Procurador/a Sr/a Pilar Perello Amengu... | Case of Tribunal Supremo Sala Primera de lo Civil of November 13 2001 | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Sevilla Andalucia Sala de lo Social of January 27 2000 | case of tribunal superior de justicia - pamplona/iruna, navarra - sala de lo social, of april 30, 2001