JOSEPH v. THE STATE., 266 Ga. 886, 471 S.E.2.d 890

Supreme Court of Georgia, ()

Docket number: S96A0798
DECIDED Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20394855
Id. vLex: VLEX-20394855

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

Citations:

Text:

Charles H. Weston, District Attorney, Thomas J. Matthews, Wayne G. Tillis, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Caroline W. Donaldson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.Laurens C. Lee, for appellant.

The appellant, Frederick Joseph, was convicted of the murder of his estranged wife, Paula Joseph, and of possession of a knife during the commission of a felony.* Joseph was sentenced to life in prison for murder and to a term of five consecutive years for the possession offense. Joseph appeals, contending that the trial court should have granted his request for a change of venue and should not have allowed the state to introduce evidence of prior difficulties with the victim. We find no error and affirm.

The state presented evidence that about 7:00 a.m. on November 22, 1991, Frederick went to a convenience store where Paula worked.

Two witnesses testified that they saw Frederick chase Paula from the store, throw her to the ground, and stab her with a butcher knife. Medical evidence established that Paula had been stabbed several times and died from a stab wound to the heart. Police arrested Frederick on the day of the stabbing and took him to a doctor's office for treatment of a laceration to his left hand. In response to a question from one of the doctor's assistants regarding whether he was married, Joseph stated, "Not anymore, I just got through killing my wife -- I just killed my wife."

The state also presented evidence that the night before the stabbing Frederick had followed Paula to a friend's apartment where he heatedly argued with her. The altercation ended only after he repeatedly kicked the driver's window of Paula's car, shattering the glass. Shortly after that incident, George Edwards, an acquaintance of Frederick, saw Frederick on a street corner. Edwards testified that Frederick was excited and upset, and first told Edwards that he had caught Paula with another man and then repeatedly told Edwards that he (Frederick) was "gonna get her."

Having reviewed the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the convictions. [2] Moreover, we find no merit either to Frederick's contention that the trial court erred in denying his request for a change of venue or to his contention that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his altercation with Paula the night before the stabbing. Accordingly, we affirm Frederick's convictions.

Notes:

2. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Other documents:
49 CFR 1017.11 - Refunds. | F. E. Booth & Company, California Packing Corporation, Carmel Canning Company, Custom House Packing Corpor... | fishery conservation and management: alaska; fisheries of exclusive economic zone pacific ocean perch, | American Fire &Amp; Casualty Company v. Standridge., 104 Ga. App. 539, 122 S.E.2d 124 (1961) | anuncio del ayuntamiento de santa coloma de cervello, sobre aprobacion de una ordenanza. | case of tribunal superior de justicia - extremadura - sala de lo social nº 372/2001, of july 20, 2001 | Case of Audiencia Provincial Vitoria of January 19 1998 | EDICTO del Servicio Provincial de Sanidad Bienestar Social y Trabajo de Zaragoza por el que se notifica a... | notificacion de fallo | case of tribunal superior de justicia - barcelona, cataluña - sala de lo contencios... | El empate hace temer un frenazo en las reformas economicas