Supreme Court of Georgia, (February 29, 1980)
Docket number: 36018
SUBMITTED
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/20404040
Id. vLex: VLEX-20404040
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

Supreme Court of Georgia - DAVENPORT v. DAVENPORT., 243 Ga. 613, 255 S.E.2.d 695 (1979)
Supreme Court of Georgia - BURNEY v. BURNEY., 233 Ga. 216, 210 S.E.2.d 727 (1974)
At the conclusion of the first trial of this matter, the trial court directed a verdict as to certain properties and the jury granted the husband a divorce, denied alimony to the wife, denied the husband's claim to the wife's one-half interest in a $14,000 certificate of deposit, and declared three deeds to the wife to be null and void. A final judgment and decree was entered dissolving the marriage, granting child custody to the former husband, making the division of money and personal property and ordering the former wife to reconvey the three parcels of real estate. See Hargrett v. Hargrett, 243 Ga. 613, 614, 615, 619 (255 SE2d 695) (1979)), in the interest of judicial economy we find no reason to retry the entire case where only one of several separable matters was found to be infected with reversible error. See Burney v. Burney, 233 Ga. 216 (210 SE2d 727) (1974) and cits. The cases relied upon by the former husband did not involve separable issues.The former husband argues that upon retrial of the real property matters, there should also be a retrial of the personal property and monetary matters settled by the judge and jury at the first trial. Some of the property matters were resolved on directed verdict and the ownership of the certificate of deposit was resolved by the jury's verdict. There was no cross appeal as to property division and thus on appeal there was no finding of error as to the division of personal property. No relationship between the personal property and real property has been shown. Alimony was denied at the first trial and that issue is not to be relitigated in the next trial. The real property controversy remaining is not inseparable from the issues of divorce, alimony, child custody or from the other property matters.The court below erred in overruling the former wife's motion for entry of judgment as to the matters of divorce, denial of alimony for the former wife, child custody and division of personal property. The only issue to be retried involves the three parcels of land.McDaniel, Seigler, Chorey & Taylor, William G. McDaniel, for appellant.1980