HARGRETT v. HARGRETT., 245 Ga. 574, 266 S.E.2.d 187 (1980)

Supreme Court of Georgia, (February 29, 1980)

Docket number: 36018
SUBMITTED Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20404040
Id. vLex: VLEX-20404040

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

Citations:

Text:

At the conclusion of the first trial of this matter, the trial court directed a verdict as to certain properties and the jury granted the husband a divorce, denied alimony to the wife, denied the husband's claim to the wife's one-half interest in a $14,000 certificate of deposit, and declared three deeds to the wife to be null and void. A final judgment and decree was entered dissolving the marriage, granting child custody to the former husband, making the division of money and personal property and ordering the former wife to reconvey the three parcels of real estate. See Hargrett v. Hargrett, 243 Ga. 613, 614, 615, 619 (255 SE2d 695) (1979)), in the interest of judicial economy we find no reason to retry the entire case where only one of several separable matters was found to be infected with reversible error. See Burney v. Burney, 233 Ga. 216 (210 SE2d 727) (1974) and cits. The cases relied upon by the former husband did not involve separable issues.

The former husband argues that upon retrial of the real property matters, there should also be a retrial of the personal property and monetary matters settled by the judge and jury at the first trial. Some of the property matters were resolved on directed verdict and the ownership of the certificate of deposit was resolved by the jury's verdict. There was no cross appeal as to property division and thus on appeal there was no finding of error as to the division of personal property. No relationship between the personal property and real property has been shown. Alimony was denied at the first trial and that issue is not to be relitigated in the next trial. The real property controversy remaining is not inseparable from the issues of divorce, alimony, child custody or from the other property matters.

The court below erred in overruling the former wife's motion for entry of judgment as to the matters of divorce, denial of alimony for the former wife, child custody and division of personal property. The only issue to be retried involves the three parcels of land.

McDaniel, Seigler, Chorey & Taylor, William G. McDaniel, for appellant.

1980

Other documents:
US v France 4th Cir 2006 | In re Complaint Against Resnick 2005 108 Ohio St.3d 160 | in re v cordova gonzalez 1st cir 1993 | Lawrence W. Olson, Individually and as Trustee of the Lawrence W. Olson Charitable Remainder Trust Dated 11/01/92, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wexford Clearing Service... | Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. Convenio.- Resolución de 22 de octubre de 2007, de la Secr... | Corrección de errores al acuerdo del Consejo de Gobierno, de 19 de octubre de 2001, mediante el cual se convocan pruebas selectivas para la prov... | disciplina urbanistica 09.02.03.11 infraccions i denuncies nom doc d22101.tra exp num di-221/01 com a consequencia de l expedient incoat en aquest negoc... | La policia descubre una tonelada de hachis escondida en el remolque de un camion cargado de naranjas | RESOLUCION de 9 de mayo de 1986, de la Comisión de Precios de Euskadi por la que se aprueban las nuevas tarifas de la Orden Hospitalaria San Juan... | Aprobación definitiva Presupuesto Ordinario 2004 | Case of Tribunal Constitucional - Sala Primera nº 166/1993, of May 20, 1993 | maximo | case of audiencia provincial huelva of february 23 2002 | Decreto n.º 147/2006 de 21 julio por el que se regula la concesión directa de subvención a través de convenio al Ayuntamiento de Lorca para la ejecución de instalaciones e...