CARR v. CARR., 238 Ga. 197, 232 S.E.2.d 69

Supreme Court of Georgia, ()

Docket number: 31761
SUBMITTED Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20406992
Id. vLex: VLEX-20406992

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

Supreme Court of Georgia - SILVERSTEIN v. SILVERSTEIN., 239 Ga. 840, 239 S.E.2.d 24 (1977)

Supreme Court of Georgia - DICKSON v. DICKSON., 238 Ga. 672, 235 S.E.2.d 479 (1977)

Text:

William F. Woods, for appellant.

This appeal by the wife is from a judgment on the pleadings entered in Dooly Superior Court which granted a divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken. The wife's original petition requested a divorce based on cruel treatment. The husband counterclaimed alleging abandonment and cruel treatment. Subsequently, he amended his counterclaim to allege that the marriage was irretrievably broken and moved for judgment on the pleadings. The wife then amended her petition to deny the marriage was irretrievably broken and filed an objection to her husband's motion. The trial judge granted the husband's motion.

Although it appears the trial court correctly granted the divorce on the pleadings under Manning v. Manning, 237 Ga. 746 (229 SE2d 611) (1976), we cannot adjudicate the merits of this appeal. The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the trial court's order granting a divorce, but reserving for subsequent determination "the issues of property settlement and alimony" is not a final judgment in the case.

We agree that the motion to dismiss has merit. The cause is still pending in the trial court and because this case was not handled as an interlocutory appeal, we cannot review in this appeal the trial court's order granting a divorce. See Code Ann. 6-701(a) 1 and 2. Where a divorce is granted on the pleadings by an order which leaves other issues for decision in the trial court, it is an interlocutory, not a final, order. Such an order cannot be appealed to this court without following the statutory procedure for interlocutory appeals.

James W. Hurt, for appellee.

1976

Other documents:
33 cfr 80.1375 - grays harbor, wa. | filling vacancies in office. elective offices - exceptions | 49 cfr 1546.405 new screeners qualifications of screening personnel. | 31 CFR 586.302 - Effective date. | agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, | Recurre al Supremo una sentencia que ordena convocar un Consejo para hablar de financiación ... | resolucion de fecha 27 de junio de 2005 de aena aeropuertos espanoles y ... | ACUERDO de 6 de mayo de 2003, del Consejo de Gobierno, por el que se fija la cuantía de los precios públicos de los bienes, servicios y actividades que presta el Insti... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Barcelona Cataluña Sala de lo Social of February 21 2005 | Applications: Crisp County Power Commission | Los trece inmigrantes que viajaban en la patera hallada en las costas de Fuerteventura murieron ...