CHAFFIN v. HOPPER., 234 Ga. 799, 218 S.E.2.d 76
Docket number: 29730
DECIDED
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/20409026
Id. vLex: VLEX-20409026
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Document language
Search in this document
Document options
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Gunter and Ingram, JJ., who concur in the judgment and Hill, J., disqualified., Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Gunter and Ingram, JJ., who concur in the judgment and Hill, J., disqualified.
James Chaffin, pro se.
The trial court did not err in remanding the appellant to custody. Other documents:
New Federal Anti-Spam Legislation Enacted
|
In Re Bayshore Ford Trucks Sales Inc 11th Cir 2006
| 25 CFR 900.99 Who takes title to any land that is part of excess BIA or IHS real p... | Affirmative Benefits And The Public Interest A Higher Hurdle For Utility Mergers?
|
2000/C 303 E/012E-1787/99 de Phillip Whitehead a la Comision Asunto Reglamento de l... |
ADJUDICACIÓN Concurso Público para la adquisición de Material Fungible diverso para el Servicio de Almacén del Hospital Ntra. Sra. de Aránz... |
Fred Berre Douglas Petitioner-Appellant v Jeanne S Woodford Warden of Rswl California State Prison At San Quentin Respondent-Appellee. 316 F.3d 1079 9... |
Anuncio sobre tramite de informacion publica, para la aprobacion de la propuesta de convenio urbanistico a suscribir entre la so... |
Información pública del Programa y Plan de Reforma Interior UE G.
|
Asunto T-368/04: Recurso interpuesto el 13 de septiembre de 2004 contra la Comision de las Comunidades Europeas por Luc Verheyden
