In the Interest of D. B. G. Et Al., Children., 226 Ga. App. 29, 485 S.E.2d 575 (1997)

Georgia Court Of Appeals, (April 03, 1997)

Docket number: A97A0464
DECIDED Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20430961
Id. vLex: VLEX-20430961

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Judgment affirmed. Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Text:

Barham & Dover, Wilton E. Stone, Jr., for appellee.John K. Edwards, Jr., for appellant.

Edward Herbst "Ned" Fullerton, the biological father of D. B. G. and C. M. G., appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights. Concluding that the lower court's ruling was supported by clear and convincing evidence, we affirm.

The father pled guilty to murdering the mother, and is currently serving a life sentence. He will first be eligible for parole in September 2009, when the children will be 16 and 19. The father murdered the mother by shooting her, and he had threatened her with a gun on previous occasions. On at least one of these occasions, the children were present. The father had a wife and other children in a nearby city, and kept the existence of the mother, D. B. G. and C. M. G. a secret. Since the mother was killed, the children have been living with their maternal uncle and his wife, who would like to adopt them.

2. Additionally, the biological father received notice of these proceedings and failed to file a petition to legitimate the children. Thus, termination of his parental rights was authorized under OCGA 15-11-83 (e), (g), and (h) as well.

3. The father also contends the trial court erred in considering a report of the guardian ad litem, since the father did not receive a copy of this report. There is no copy of the report in the record, but it appears from the lower court's order that the report simply recommended that the children continue to stay with the uncle -- a recommendation the father agreed with anyway -- without addressing the question of termination of parental rights. In any case, the father has failed to show how he was harmed by the court's consideration of the report without ensuring that he had a copy.

Other documents:
D. G. Machinery &Amp; Gage Company v. Hardy Et Al., 118 Ga. App. 45, 162 S.E.2d 852 (1968) | Miller Et Ux. v. United States., 186 F.2d 937 (5th Cir. 1951) | 44 USC 3548 Sec 3548 Authorization of appropriations | Brewer v City of overland Park Police Dept 10th Cir 2002 | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Córdoba, Sección 3ª nº 12/2007, of January 22, 2007 | Resolución de la Unidad de Contratación de la Subdirección General de Se... | Case of Tribunal Supremo Sala Segunda de lo Penal of May 06 1997 | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Cataluna, of October 14, 1999 | Resolucion del Servicio Catalan de la Salud por la que se convoca la licitacion de un contrato para el equipamiento de la unidad de radi... | resolucion del instituto aragonés de fomento por la que se anuncia concurso público, p... | convocatoria asamblea general ordinaria. | Tafalla - Aprobación inicial Proyecto Cuenta de Liquidación definitiva cuotas urbanización UAO-2