Ware v. Handy Storage., 222 Ga. App. 339, 474 S.E.2d 240 (1996)

Georgia Court Of Appeals, (July 17, 1996)

Docket number: A96A1967
DECIDED Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20432716
Id. vLex: VLEX-20432716

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Appeal dismissed. Johnson and Ruffin, JJ., concur.

Text:

Handy Storage, pro se.Tony L. Ware, pro se.

Plaintiff Tony L. Ware, proceeding pro se, brought this action for damages against defendant Handy Storage, alleging that he had contracted to lease a portion of defendant's warehouse for storage but that defendant "willfully converted plaintiff['s] personal property," allegedly worth $14,000,000, by deliberately removing the contents of plaintiff's leased space. Service of process was made upon the Georgia Secretary of State and, after defendant failed to answer, plaintiff moved for a default judgment. The trial court determined that the damages sought by plaintiff were unliquidated damages and denied plaintiff's motion for judgment by default. This direct appeal followed. Held:

Plaintiff's notice of appeal recites that it is an appeal "from a Default Judgment entered and filed. . . ." This is incorrect, since plaintiff's motion was expressly denied by the trial court. The Georgia Civil Practice Act, at OCGA 9-11-55, distinguishes between a default, which involves an interlocutory matter, and a default judgment, which represents final judicial action and the vesting of rights. Lanier v. Foster, 133 Ga. App. 149, 153 (3) (210 SE2d 326). In the case sub judice, the denial of plaintiff's motion for default judgment is not a final adjudication but is an interlocutory ruling which is not directly appealable. OCGA 5-6-34 (a) (1). Since plaintiff has failed to comply with the mandatory procedures for seeking permission to pursue an interlocutory appeal, the unauthorized direct appeal in the case sub judice must be dismissed. Havischak v. Neal, 176 Ga. App. 203 (335 SE2d 469).

Other documents:
Adjustment assistance Suckle Corp., | Thomas v. The State., 161 Ga. App. 159, 288 S.E.2d 112 (1982) | edgerly v city and county of san francisco 9th cir 2008 | consent to exchange of lands | RESOLUCION de 21 de junio de 2005 de la Gerencia de la Orquesta Sinfónica del Principado de Astu... | banco etchevarria primera oficina de banca personal en vigo | edicto de 18 de noviembre de 2003 de la delegacion provincial de almeria comision provincial de asistencia juridica gratuita. | Decreto de Alcaldia 3797/ 02 DU. | Peoples Natural Gas Co v Public Serv Comm n of Pa. 270 U.S 550 1926 | Notice Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8 B States that Opinions and Orders Which Are Designated as Not Citable as Precedent Shall Not Be Employed or Cited as Preced... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Oviedo, Asturias - Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, of April 04, 2... | case of tribunal superior de justicia santander cantabria sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of june 10 2005