Huewitt v. The State., 218 Ga. App. 566, 462 S.E.2d 463 (1995)

Georgia Court Of Appeals, (September 21, 1995)

Docket number: A95A1226
DECIDED Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20434525
Id. vLex: VLEX-20434525

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Judgment affirmed. Andrews and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Citations:

Text:

M. E. Thompson, Jr., for appellant.

Defendant was indicted for committing forgery in the first degree in violation of OCGA 16-9-1 (a). The State presented evidence at a jury trial showing that defendant presented a check for payment at a grocery store that had recently been stolen from the victims' place of business, Stracener Construction Company. The State also proved that the stolen check was made out to defendant for $125.40, is inscribed with the name of the victims' business and bears the forged endorsement of the victim, Bobby Stracener. Defendant testified that "Mackie Lee Lewis" gave him the check, and he admitted (on cross-examination) that he witnessed "Mackie Lee Lewis" endorse the check with the name "Bobby Stracener."

The jury found defendant guilty of the crime charged. This appeal followed entry of judgment of conviction and sentence. Held:

In his sole enumeration of error, defendant contends the evidence is insufficient to authorize a finding that he intended to defraud anybody when he attempted to "pass a forged check. . . ." This contention is without merit. "[S]ince 'knowingly passing as genuine a forged instrument is conclusive of the intent to defraud,' Jordan v. State, 264 Ga. 673, 674 (2), 675 (449 SE2d 850). The evidence is sufficient to authorize the jury's finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of committing forgery in the first degree in violation of OCGA 16-9-1 (a). Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Howard v. State, 215 Ga. App. 342, 343 (1) (450 SE2d 824).

H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Bradfield M. Shealy, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Other documents:
Davis v. Osbore (4th Cir. 2006) | Meetings Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, | us v scarbrough 4th cir 2006 | competitive enterprise institute, et al., petitioners, v. national highway traffic safety administration, respondent, automobile importers... | Resolucio del conseller d'Educacio i Cultura per la qual s'autoritzen els preus que s'han de satisfer per prestar determinats serveis ... | Exposicion publica de la Cuenta General y estados de los ejercicios 2000 y 2001 | arizona state board for charter schools; excel education centers, inc., an oregon corporation; phoenix education management, llc, a delawar... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Barcelona, Cataluna - Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, of September 01, 2004 | Tesorería Territorial de Santa Cruz de Tenerife.- Edicto de 13 de mayo de 2002, relativo a notifi... | Peterson v. U.S. ***, 866 F.2d 1422 (11th Cir. 1989) | Case of Audiencia Nacional - Sala de lo Contencioso, of November 25, 2005