Smith v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (Ohio 2005)

Ohio Supreme Court, Court of Claims (April 05, 2005)

Docket number: 2004-04957-AD
2005-Ohio-2030 Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/21612853
Id. vLex: VLEX-21612853

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

Driver’s license allegedly erroneously suspended. Evidence established license suspension was warranted. Burden of proof, duty of care. Judgment for defendant.

Text:

[Cite as Smith v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, 2005-Ohio-2030.]

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO LORETTA SMITH :

Plaintiff :

v. : CASE NO. 2004AD

OH BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES : MEMORANDUM DECISION

Defendant :

____________________

On December 3, 2003, Jonzell R. Byrd, was driving a 1998 Saturn sedan within the village limits of Linndale, Ohio when he was stopped by a local law enforcement officer for speeding. Incident to a check of his driver's license status, Byrd was issued a citation for driving under license suspension. In addition to the license suspension and citations, Byrd was issued a citation for failure to show proof of insurance. The Saturn sedan Byrd was driving was towed and impounded. The impounded vehicle was owned by plaintiff, Loretta Smith, the mother of Jonzell Byrd.

Plaintiff has alleged defendant, Bureau of Motor Vehicles ("BMV"), improperly recorded Jonzell Byrd's license as suspended which resulted in her car being impounded. Consequently, plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover $110.00 for towing and impound fees, plus $25.00 for filing fee reimbursement. Plaintiff also requested damages of $60.00 for court costs she paid and a net amount of $6.00, "to get my son out of jail." Total damages claimed amount of $201.00.1

Defendant has insisted Jonzell Byrd's driver's license was 1 The $25.00 filing fee was paid.

- 1 -

Case No. 2004AD MEMORANDUM DECISION validly listed as suspended on December 3, 2003, the day he was issued multiple citations including driving under a license suspension. Defendant explained BMV received information from the Bedford Municipal Court on October 23, 2003, establishing Jonzell Byrd failed to provide proof of insurance on September 20, 2003, when he was stopped for a speeding violation. Based on the information supplied by the Bedford Municipal Court, BMV entered a non-compliance license suspension on Jonzell Byrd's record effective November 28, 2003. Defendant maintained a notice of the suspension letter was sent to Jonzell Byrd's residence notifying him of the suspension action effective November 28, 2003. Defendant denied receiving any documentation necessary to clear Jonzell Byrd's suspension status prior to December 3, 2003. On December 4, 2003, proof of insurance was submitted to BMV and Jonzell Byrd's non-compliance suspension based on the September 20, 2003, incident was deleted from defendant's records. Defendant asserted Jonzell Byrd's driver's license was accurately listed as suspended on December 3, 2003. Defendant supplied BMV records supporting this assertion.

Considering the information available to defendant, no evidence has been offered to show BMV acted improperly in listing Jonzell Byrd's license as suspended. Resulting monetary damages are recoverable when plaintiff proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, defendant erroneously records driver's license information. Ankney v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1998), 97 AD; Serbanescu v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1994), 93AD; Black v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1996), 95AD. In the instant action, plaintiff has failed to prove that defendant erroneously recorded her son's driver's license status. McKenzie v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, 2002AD, 2003-Ohio-2430.

- 2 -

Case No. 2004AD MEMORANDUM DECISION Evidence indicates defendant's records were accurate under the circumstances when this cause of action accrued. Elliott v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles (2001), 2001AD, jud. IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

LORETTA SMITH :

Plaintiff :

v. : CASE NO. 2004AD

OH BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES : ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Defendant :

____________________

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

____________________

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Loretta Smith Plaintiff, Pro se 12810 Arlington Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44108 John R. Guldin For Defendant Associate Legal Counsel

- 3 -

Ohio Department of Public Safety, Legal Services 1970 West Broad Street P.O. Box 182081 Columbus, Ohio 43218-2081 RDK/laa 3/23 Filed 4/5/05 Sent to S.C. reporter 4/29/

- 4 -

Other documents:
The Hbumphriyes Manufacturing Company C~nd Pattern Makers League Of North America a F L. 983 1943 | 22 usc 290 - sec. 290g742l-6. effectiveness of agreement | case of tribunal superior de justicia madrid sala de lo contencioso-administrativo ... | anuncio por el que se notifica a los interesados la resolución de 5 de junio de 2003 del viceconsejero de cultura juventud y deportes de no desafección del i... | Real Decreto 2265/1982 de 27 de agosto sobre la Colaboracion del Ministerio de agri... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Granada Andalucia Sala de lo Social of November 18 1999 | en los autos de juicios de faltas nº 443-99 que se siguen en este juzgado de instrucción nº 3... | ETA llama al proyecto de Ibarretxe 'fraude vestido de reforma autonomica' | El color de la luz | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Valladolid, Castilla y León - Sala de lo Social, of March 17, 1998 | case of tribunal superior de justicia - sevilla, andalucía - sala de lo contencioso-administrativo, of march 15, 1999