Final appealable order, journalized, file-stamp, trial court clerk, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, dismissed.

[Cite as Lakewood v. Zingale, 2006-Ohio-301.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

NOS. 86401 and 86402

CITY OF LAKEWOOD,

:

:

: JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee :

: AND v. :

: OPINION JAMES C. ZINGALE,

:

:

: Defendant-Appellant :

DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION:

JANUARY 26, 2006

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal Appeal from Lakewood Municipal Court, Case No. 04-C-2773.

JUDGMENT:

DISMISSED.

DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Brian T. Corrigan City of Lakewood Law Director Andrew S. Robinson, Jr.

Assistant City Prosecutor 12650 Detroit Avenue Lakewood, OH 44107

For Defendant-Appellant: Dennis N. LoConti Forbes, Fields & Associates Rockefeller Building, Suite 700 614 West Superior Avenue Cleveland, OH

- 1 -

CHRISTINE T. McMONAGLE, J.:

Defendant-appellant, James C. Zingale, pled no contest to physical control of a motor vehicle while intoxicated and driving while under suspension after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. The charges were brought under two separate cases, which were later consolidated. In four assignments of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the appeal for lack of a finable appealable order.

Appellant has attached three entries (the entry denying his motion to suppress and a sentencing entry for each of the two cases) from the Lakewood Municipal Court as the judgments from which he attempts to appeal. While these entries were journalized, they were never file-stamped by the trial court clerk. The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that a reviewing court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to reach the merits in an appeal from a judgment entry that has not been file-stamped by the trial court clerk. State v. Domers (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 592, 575 N.E.2d 832.

See, also, Kovach v. Callahan (Dec. 23, 1999), Cuyahoga App. No. 75189; Cleveland Heights v. Jones (Jan. 26, 1995), Cuyahoga App.

No. 65990; Steingel v. Waiwood (Jan. 12, 1995), Cuyahoga App. No. 66813.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

This appeal is dismissed.

- 2 -

It is, therefore, ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.

It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to the Lakewood Municipal Court directing said court to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

CHRISTINE T. McMONAGLE

JUDGE

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, J., CONCUR.

N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also, S.Ct.Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1).

- 3 -