46 USC 2114 - Sec. 2114. Protection of seamen against discrimination

46 USC - US Code - Title 46: Shipping (January 2004)


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/22512011

Id. vLex: VLEX-22512011

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

  (a)(1) A person may not discharge or in any manner discriminate against a seaman because - (A) the seaman in good faith has reported or is about to report to the Coast Guard or other appropriate Federal agency or department that the seaman believes that a violation of a maritime safety law or regulation prescribed under that law or regulation has occurred; or (B) the seaman has refused to perform duties ordered by the seaman's employer because the seaman has a reasonable apprehension or expectation that performing such duties would result in serious injury to the seaman, other seamen, or the public. (2) The circumstances causing a seaman's apprehension of serious injury under paragraph (1)(B) must be of such a nature that a reasonable person, under similar circumstances, would conclude that there is a real danger of an injury or serious impairment of health resulting from the performance of duties as ordered by the seaman's employer. (3) To qualify for protection against the seaman's employer under paragraph (1)(B), the employee must have sought from the employer, and been unable to obtain, correction of the unsafe condition. (b) A seaman discharged or otherwise discriminated against in violation of this section may bring an action in an appropriate district court of the United States.

In that action, the court may order any appropriate relief, including - (1) restraining violations of this section; (2) reinstatement to the seaman's former position with back pay; (3) an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing plaintiff not exceeding $1,000; and (4) an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing employer not exceeding $1,000 if the court finds that a complaint filed under this section is frivolous or has been brought in bad faith.


Amendments

2002 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107-295, Sec. 428(a), amended subsec. (a) generally.

Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "An owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, or individual in charge of a vessel may not discharge or in any manner discriminate against a seaman because the seaman in good faith has reported or is about to report to the Coast Guard that the seaman believes that a violation of this subtitle, or a regulation issued under this subtitle, has occurred." Subsec. (b)(3), (4). Pub. L. 107-295, Sec. 428(b), added pars. (3) and (4).

Transfer Of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

Other documents:
Bank One NA vs. Catchings (5th Cir. 2002) | United States of America, Appellee, v. Stephen R. Gibson, A/K/a Keith Miller, Appellant.... | Creating Virtual Beds With Aggressive Throughput Management | World Trade Organization: Dispute settlement panel proceedings— United States; subsidies to upland cotton, | Sanciones. Resolucion de 24-10-1997, delegacion provincial de agricultura y medio ambiente de cuenca por la que se notifica la resoluciÓn de procedimiento sancion... | RESOLUCIÓN de 24 de abril de 2007, de la Dirección Gerencia del Servicio Andaluz de Salud, por la que se convoca contratación en su ámbito (CCA +3G­M3X). (PD. 1629/2... | La «fiebre» del monovolumen compacto | Merck recortó un 4% sus beneficios en 2006 | Procedimiento poco frecuente | Beschikking van de Raad van 20 maart 2000 betreffende de steun die RIBS SpA conform het bepaalde in de nationale wet ... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Madrid - Sala de lo Social nº 167/2008, of February 26, 2008