Federal Circuits, 5th Cir. (August 25, 2006)
Docket number: 05-20897
Not Published
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/22985566
Id. vLex: VLEX-22985566
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

U.S. Supreme Court - Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
U.S. Supreme Court - Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 25, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20897 Conference CalendarUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,versusNICANDRO RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-276-ALL Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM:* Nicandro Rodriguez-Martinez (Rodriguez) appeals his guilty- plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry of a deported alien following an aggravated felony conviction. Rodriguez argues that the "felony" and "aggravated felony" provisions of 8U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional. Rodriguez's constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Rodriguez contends that Almendarez-Torres was * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rodriguez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED.