Grace Under Pressure: Fifteen Steps You Should Take to Manage Successfully a Search of Your Client's Office Pursuant to a Federal Warrant

United States Law Articles in English (2008)

- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/29350068
Id. vLex: VLEX-29350068

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pamela Jean Gantt, Defendant-Appellee., 194 F.3d 987 (9th Cir. 1999)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - in Re Grand Jury Investigation Concerning Solid State Devices, Inc. and Unisem International. Solid State Devices, Inc.; Unisem International, Petitioners-Appellants, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 130 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 1997)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - Edward A. Breidenbach, Mary Ellen Breidenbach, Frank D. Breidenbach, Geraldine E. Breidenbach, Edward John Breidenbach, Scott A. Harms, Gina L. Bullock, Jason Bullock, Christopher Harms, Nicole Harms, Fransisco Serrano, Steven G. Harms, Jennifer Harms, and Chad Harms, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Don Bolish, Sheriff of Logan County, Ray Neville, Deputy Sheriff With Logan County Sheriff'S Department, County of Logan, a County of the State of Colorado, and John Does I Through Xl, Officers and Agents of Various Governmental Entities Including Colorado National Guard, Defendants, and Nicola Gesi, Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent, in His Official Capacity, Defendant-Appellant., 126 F.3d 1288 (10th Cir. 1997) Mary Ellen Breidenbach, Frank D. Breidenbach, Geraldine E. Breidenbach, Edward John Breidenbach, Scott A. Harms, Gina L. Bullock, Jason Bullock, Christopher Harms, Nicole Harms, Fransisco Serrano, Steven G. Harms, Jennifer Harms, and Chad Harms, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Don Bolish, Sheriff of Logan County, Ray Neville, Deputy Sheriff With Logan County Sheriff'S Department, County of Logan, a County of the State of Colorado, and John Does I Through Xl, Officers and Agents of Various Governmental Entities Including Colorado National Guard, Defendants, and Nicola Gesi, Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent, in His Official Capacity, Defendant-Appellant.

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 2232 - Sec. 2232. Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure - 18 USC 2231 - Sec. 2231. Assault or resistance


See all quotations

Headnotes:

Extract:

Grace Under Pressure: Fifteen Steps You Should Take to Manage Successfully a Search of Your Client's Office Pursuant to a Federal Warrant

By Marcellus A. McRae, Brian C. Goebel & Mark Mermelstein*

Originally published on August 2, 2002

Introduction

One day you may receive a telephone call from a panicked client telling you that federal agents have entered the client's offices, seized control of the premises, started questioning the employees, and announced that they are executing a search warrant. If you receive that call, what should you do?

This article attempts to answer that question by providing guidance to those confronted with the task of responding to the execution of a search warrant. It is not intended to be a comprehensive examination of the Fourth Amendment, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or any other federal or statelaw relating to the execution of search warrants. Although this Article focuses on federal law, many of the principles discussed also apply to searches conducted by state officers. Likewise, although the Article discusses the search of corporate offices, many of the objectives and steps described apply to searches of individual residences.[1]

Discussed below are severalobjectives that you should have in mind as you manage a search of your client's office. Although a defense attorney cannot prevent or completely eliminate the disruption associated with a search, focusing on these objectives should help you to minimize that disruption and to place your client in the best possible legal position following the search. This Article then suggests fifteen steps that you should take before, during, and after a search in order to meet these objectives.

Objectives For Managing a Search

There are severalobjectives that you should have in mind as you manage a search of your client's office, including:

Gain as much control over the flow of information to the government as is legally possible;

Verify that the search is constitutional and lawful;

Protect any privileged documents;

Obtain information from the government concerning the scope of the search, the underlying investigation or circumstances that prompted the search, and your client's status in the investigation;

Minimize the disruption caused by the search; and

Position the client to seek appropriate relief after the search

Fifteen Steps You Should Take To Achieve These Objectives

Before leaving the office you should:

advise your client of his rights and determine the identities of the prosecutor and a...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
138758 - Grup Empresarial el Terrat Sl. | INFORMACIÓN pública relativa a la aprobación inicial del Plan Parcial de Orde... | EDICTO de 26 de mayo de 1998, sobre un acuerdo de la Comision de Urbanismo de Barcelona referente al mu... | FARMACIAS DE GUARDIA (Información facilitada por el Colegio de Farmacéuticos) | Acórdão Nº 94524 of Tribunal Pleno, of November 18, 1983 | Acordao Inteiro Teor n ED-AIRR-743527/2001 of 4 Turma of December 12 2001 | Sentenza nº 4142 of T.A.R - Lazio Roma of May 09 2007 | Monsoon Unlikely to Hit City in Next 24 Hours [Mumbai] | decisao monocratica n 70011831203 of tribunal de justica do rs - decima terceira camara civ... | Decisao Monocratica N 70030837660 of Tribunal de Justica do RS Primeira Camara Civel of June 26 2009 | rechtbank van koophandel te brugge afdeling brugge bij vonnis van de eerste kamer bis van de rechtbank van koophandel te brugge afdeling brugge d.d 1 d... | Acordao indexados n ROAR-396520-1997-02 of , of April 07, 2000

Previous | Table of Contents | Next