Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Allen Lou Stickles, Petitioner, v. Veterans Administration, Respondent., 829 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1987)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (August 28, 1987)

Docket number: 87-3810
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37170520
Id. vLex: VLEX-37170520

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

Allen Lou Stickles, appellant pro se.

Robert A. Reutershan, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice; Paul Silverman, General Counsel, Veterans Administration, for appellee.

Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Allen Lou Stickles was an air-conditioning and refrigeration mechanic for the Veterans Administration. In January of 1983, he was removed from his job pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec . 7512. Stickles appealed his removal through a negotiated grievance procedure. In May of 1984, an arbitrator decided that Stickles was entitled to reinstatement but that he was not entitled to back pay.

In February of 1987, Stickles appealed the arbitrator's decision to this Court. The Veterans Administration filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the appeal was both untimely and filed in the wrong circuit. Stickles filed a motion to transfer his appeal. Because we find that it would not be in the interest of justice to transfer this case, we grant the Veterans Administration's motion to dismiss.

Matters covered by 5 U.S.C. Sec . 7512 raised under a negotiated grievance procedure must be appealed to the Federal Circuit. See 5 U.S.C. Sec . 7121(f); 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 7703(b)(1) (West Supp. 1987). This Circuit has no jurisdiction over Stickles' appeal.

As Stickles brought this appeal two and one-half years after the arbitrator made his decision, we find that a transfer would not be in the interest of justice. Stickles had thirty days to appeal from the arbitrator's decision, and the Federal Circuit has held that this period for appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. See Monzo v. Department of Transportation, 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Thus, Stickles' appeal is dismissed. As the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

DISMISSED.

Other documents:
Gordon v Parsons Brinckerhoff ** 880 F.2d 419 11th Cir 1989 | State v Dorsey Ohio 2002 | Manuel Gonz Lez-Soberal Petitioner Appellant v United States of America Respondent Appellee. 244 F.3d 273 1st Cir 2001 | DECRETO FORAL 329/1996, de 16 de septiembre, por el que se declara de utilidad publica y se aprueba la desafectacion de parte de dos pa... | Jose Valerio-Ochoa Petitioner v Immigration and Naturalization Service Respondent. 241 F.3d 1092 9th Cir 2001 | decreto 171/2008 de 1 de agosto por el que se establece el curriculo del ciclo formativo de grad... | DECRETO 119/1994 de 26 de mayo por el que se nombran miembros del Consejo Económico y S... | NOTIFICACION del Servicio Territorial de Medio Ambiente de Leon por la que se comunica el Pliego de Cargos relativo al exp...