Unpublished Disposition Notice: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(C) States that Unpublished Orders, Judgments, and Explanatory Memoranda May Not Be Cited as Precedents, But Counsel May Refer To Unpublished Dispositions When the Binding or Preclusive Effect of the Disposition, Rather Than Its Quality as Precedent, is Relevant. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent., 871 F.2d 155 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
Federal Circuits, D.C. Cir. (March 24, 1989)
Docket number: 88-1423
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/37252843
Id. vLex: VLEX-37252843
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
Search in this document
Document options
Before HARRY T. EDWARDS and RUTH B. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges, and FRANK A. KAUFMAN, United States Senior District Judge*.
JUDGMENTThis petition was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. The court concludes that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). We are satisfied, after full review of the matter, that there is no cause to disturb the approval granted by the Commission to Northern Indiana Public Service Company's proposed restructuring. It is thereforeORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and that the order approving the reorganization be affirmed. * Sitting by designation pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Sec . 294(d) Other documents:
Christopher v U.S 10th Cir 2003
|
42 USC 2011 - Sec. 2011. Congressional declaration of policy
| Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Valladolid, Castilla y León - Sala de lo S... | Prisa gana un 25% más hasta septiembre | 10 CFR 61.27 Application for renewal or closure.
|
resolucion tic/3304/2002 de 8 de noviembre de delegacion de competencias del consejero de trabajo industria comercio y turismo en el director gener... | flashes... | China restringira la informacion sobre desastres y emergencias
