Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Leroy Howard, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Acme-Cleveland Corporation, D/B/a Cleveland Twist Drill Company, Defendant-Appellee., 887 F.2d 1087 (6th Cir. 1989)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (October 20, 1989)

Docket number: 89-3804
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37282168
Id. vLex: VLEX-37282168

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge*.

ORDER

The plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his action with prejudice for want of prosecution. On September 12, 1989, this Court entered an order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiff has filed no response.

The district court entered its final judgment on July 19, 1989. Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), the plaintiff had thirty days, i.e., until August 18, 1989, in which to file a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal filed on August 29, 1989, was not within that time period. The district court record filed with this Court shows that no extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal was sought. Timely filing of a notice of appeal is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections of Illinois, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978); Peake v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016, 1018 (6th Cir.1983).

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Local Rules.

* The Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Other documents:
Sheard v The State. 121 Ga App 666 175 S.E.2d 148 1970 | in re pitts ohio 2006 | Purposes of taxes and appropriations | Número de Identificación Único: 07040 1 0019723/2005 Procedimiento: Procedimiento Ordinario 1092/2005 Sobre Procedimiento Ordinario De D/ña. Sebastián Fornes ... | 25 usc 1405 - sec. 1405. effective date of plan; joint resolution of disapproval | Las nuevas elecciones en Perú serán el 8 de abril | State of Ohio v Terry L King Ohio 2000 | case of tribunal superior de justicia comunidad valenciana sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of april 26 2004 | NOTIFICACIÓN de la resolución del expediente de sanción SG-25625-O-98.