Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Michael Houston, Plaintiff-Appellee v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant, 888 F.2d 127 (6th Cir. 1989)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (October 25, 1989)

Docket number: 88-2093
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37282824
Id. vLex: VLEX-37282824

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The United States as appellant, with the consent of Michael Houston, through his attorney, Thomas A. Klug, has moved for a waiver of filing briefs and disposition of the case without oral argument on the grounds that the instant case is in all material ways identical with the case of Planned Investment, Inc. v. United States (6th Cir., No. 88-1668), decided and filed August 10, 1989. Upon the representation of Gary R. Allen, Chief of the Appellate Section of the Tax Division, that the parties consent to this disposition of the case,

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Other documents:
7 CFR 953.4 - Production area. | USA vs Sanchez 5th Cir 2008 | Maryland Casualty Co v Paton Et Al. 194 F.2d 765 9th Cir 1952 | case of audiencia provincial - madrid, sección 9ª nº 780/2003, of december 15, 2003 | usa vs. brown (5th cir. 1999) | instalaciones electricas. anuncio de 18-02-1986, consejeria de industria y comercio informacion publi... | sue e. dixon v. vera lloyd home (8th cir. 2004) | grand rapids cabinet company, employer and local 415, industrial workers union, upholsterers international union of north america, afl, petitioner, 19... | Inmates of D.C Jail Appellees v Delbert C Jackson Appellant. 158 F.3d 1357 D.C Cir 1998