Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James Arthur Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen S. Green, Acting Warden; Thomas Kimball, Acting Assistant Warden; R. Wilson, Captain; Lieutenant Holly, Defendants-Appellees., 898 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1990)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (February 21, 1990)

Docket number: 89-7736
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37301724
Id. vLex: VLEX-37301724

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Daniel E. Klein, Jr., United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 88-3742-JH)

James Arthur Davis, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James Arthur Davis appeals the magistrate's report and recommendation that judgment be entered against him in this 42 U.S.C. Sec . 1983 action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Under 28 U.S.C. Sec . 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders. A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties. It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).

As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec . 1291. The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec . 1292. Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED.

Other documents:
King Features Syndicate, Inc. And American Newspaper Guild, 585 (1940) | 33 usc 2604 - sec. 2604. suspension, revocation, and injunctions | United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy Monroe, Defendant-Appellant., 833 F.2d 95 (6th Cir. 1987) | Zidane se estrena hoy en Lausana | ExxonMobil Gas Mkt vs. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2002) | Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v O Neill 266 U.S 292 1924 | EDICTO de la Division Provincial de Turismo de Zaragoza, por el que se notifica la puesta a disposicion de la propues... | Notificacion previa de una operacion de concentracion (asunto COMP/M.2746 Volkswagen/Svenska Volkswagen) Asunto susceptible de... | Solicitud de autorización administrativa de instalación eléctrica y de declaración de su utilidad pública | Calderón dinamita a Rusia El base español despeja el camino hacia el triunfo en un duelo af... | el pp critica al pleno | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Comunidad Valenciana - Sala de lo Contenc...