Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Douglas Keith Frye, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James N. Rollins, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 904 F.2d 700 (4th Cir. 1990)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (July 09, 1990)

Docket number: 90-6779
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37314962
Id. vLex: VLEX-37314962

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-828-HAR).

Douglas Keith Frye, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Beverly Peyton Griffith, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Keith Frye seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Frye v. Rollins, C/A No. 88-828-HAR (D.Md. Jan. 31, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Other documents:
William Harold Hilborn v C Marshall Dann Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks and Robert M Cuthbert. 546 F.2d 401 Fed Cir 19... | Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored... | Bull Insular Line Inc. The New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. Waterman Dock Company Lykes Bros... | Case of Audiencia Provincial Madrid Seccion 3 n 104/2008 of April 08 2008 | 40 CFR 265.11 - Identification number. | RESOLUCIÓ de 21 de gener de 2004 per la qual es fa públic el nomenament de la funcionària que ha superat les... | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Valencia, Sección 11ª nº 301/2008, of May 08, 2008 | Resolución de 12 de febrero de 2007 de la Delegación Provincial de Lugo por la que se somete a información... | case of tribunal superior de justicia madrid sala de lo contencioso-administrativo of november 20 1997 | RESOLUCIÓN de 24 de octubre de 2001, de la Secretaría General Técnica, por la qu...