Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Robert L. Young, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Wireman, Respondent-Appellee., 915 F.2d 1574 (6th Cir. 1990)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (October 10, 1990)

Docket number: 90-1307
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37333517
Id. vLex: VLEX-37333517

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Ronald Weaver; Leo Mckaye; Morris Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Raymond Toombs; Robert Brown, Jr.; Donald Mason; Robert Mulvaney; Ted Strassburg, Defendants-Appellees., 948 F.2d 1004 (6th Cir. 1991)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Cir. - Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Siler, and Archie B. Powers, Defendants-Appellants., 951 F.2d 351 (6th Cir. 1991)

Text:

Young appeals from the district court's judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2254. The receipt of the certified record has been construed as an application for a certificate of probable cause. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

In a MeCosta County, Michigan, state court, Young pled guilty to armed robbery and received a fifteen to forty year sentence. He exhausted his state remedies. In his petition, Young raised four claims: 1) where the trial judge declines to follow a sentencing recommendation, the judge must allow the defendant a chance to withdraw his plea, 2) the trial judge erred in considering other robberies when sentencing Young, 3) the trial court violated Young's right to a speedy trial, and 4) Young's counsel rendered ineffective assistance.

The district court held that a defendant is not entitled to withdraw his plea merely because he discovers that he did not correctly assess every factor relevant to sentencing. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 757 (1970). Moreover, the district court also held that a trial court may consider other criminal activity for which no conviction resulted especially where, as here, the defendant admits the conduct. Fabiano v. Wheeler, 583 F.2d 265, 269-70 (6th Cir.1978). Finally, the court held that the last two issues also lacked merit.

Upon consideration, this court concludes that the district court correctly denied the petition. Accordingly, the application for a certificate of probable cause is denied.

Other documents:
notice ninth circuit rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for... | 24 cfr 235.1208 eligible mortgagors. | El FAD acoge la primera edicion del Forum Laus Europe | anuncio de 07-04-2003, de la comisión provincial de urbanismo de toledo, relativo a la exposic... | Un americano en la cancha del zar | Anuncio sobre suspension de licencias de parcelacion y edificacion en las nuevas zonas de ampliacion del suelo ... | Tradición musical cubana en el Palau de la Música | CLEMENTS et al. v. CLEMENTS., 247 Ga. 787, 279 S.E.2.d 698 | Case of Tribunal Supremo - Sala Segunda, de lo Penal, of May 20, 1997 | cintra sella el contrato para la autopista de indiana