Notice: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Martin F. Troche, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Petersburg, Virginia, and Any Other Person Having Custody and Control of the Body of Said Martin F. Troche, Respondent-Appellee. Martin F. Troche, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Petersburg, Virginia, and Any Other Person Having Custody and Control of the Body of Said Martin F. Troche, Respondent-Appellee., 925 F.2d 1457 (4th Cir. 1991)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (February 19, 1991)

Docket number: 90-6888,90-6890
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37352285
Id. vLex: VLEX-37352285

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Document options

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - Tyger Construction Company Incorporated, a South Carolina Corporation, Individually and for the Use and Benefit of Tyger-Pensacola Joint Venture, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pensacola Construction Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Tyger Construction Company Incorporated, a South Carolina Corporation, Individually and for the Use and Benefit of Tyger-Pensacola Joint Venture, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pensacola Construction Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant., 29 F.3d 137 (4th Cir. 1994)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-1078-N)

Martin F. Troche, appellant pro se.

Michael Anson Rhine, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Troche appeals from the district court's orders refusing habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2241 and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we deny Troche's motion for release pending appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Troche v. Warden, CA-90-1078-N (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 1990; Sept. 10, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Other documents:

40 cfr 471.81 effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reducti... | williams v. duke et al., 240 ga. 569, 242 s.e.2.d 67 (1977) | Edicto. | Edicto | RESOLUCIÓ INT/1678/2006 de 21 d abril d atorgament de la medalla de bronze al mèrit policial amb distintiu blau a un funcionari del cos de mossos d esquadra. | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Valladolid, Castilla y León - Sala de lo Contencioso-Ad... | Inhalt | case of tribunal superior de justicia málaga andalucía sala de lo social of november 28 2003 | Numero de Identificacion Unico: 07033 2 0100199/2003 D./Dna. Juan Gutierrez Munoz Secretario del Juzgado de Instruccion Numero 1 de Manacor. Doy Fe y Testimonio... | sí sí sí nos vamos a parís

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

Cited by:

Text:

Case Law