Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Ronald W. Jarvi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael D. Noble; Ann M. Noble, Defendants-Appellees., 928 F.2d 1133 (6th Cir. 1991)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (March 27, 1991)

Docket number: 90-2341
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37357712
Id. vLex: VLEX-37357712

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

E.D.Mich. 88-70715, Friedman, J.

E.D.Mich.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before KEITH and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellant's motions for expedited decision and for miscellaneous relief. The appellees have not responded.

A review of the record indicates that the district court entered an order on September 14, 1990, denying a petition for removal from a state court and dismissing the appellant's pro se complaint without prejudice. A motion to amend the court's findings was denied by order entered on September 26, 1990. The appellant thereafter filed several similar motions, all of which were denied. The order denying the last of these motions was filed on October 31, 1990, and was entered the following day. The appellant's notice of appeal was filed on November 26, 1990.

Successive motions for reconsideration do not toll the 30-day appeal period prescribed by Rule 4(a), Fed.R.App.P. See Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co., 915 F.2d 201, 206 (6th Cir.1990). None of the motions filed by the appellant on and after September 26, 1990, tolled the running of the time for appeal, and the notice of appeal filed on November 26 was therefore untimely.

It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The motions for expedited decision and miscellaneous relief are denied.

Other documents:
state v spicer ohio 2005 | Bocanegra vs. Chevron USA Inc (5th Cir. 2001) | Berg v. Foster (10th Cir. 2007) | Nutrilite Products, Inc. v. Research Industries Corporation, 840 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1988) | case of tribunal superior de justicia madrid sala de lo contencioso-administrativo n 506/2006 of march 29 2006 | resolucion de 7 de octubre de 1986, de la dirección general de cultura, por la que se abre periodo de información pública, en el expediente para la declarac... | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Comunidad Valenciana - Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, of Novem... | case of audiencia provincial barcelona sección 17ª nº 88/2008 of february 20 2008 | NOTIFICACION del Servicio Provincial de Obras Publicas Urbanismo y Transportes de Teruel a los interesados relacionados en el anexo de la audiencia pro... | El Gobierno esta lisa y llanamente desbordado asegura Rajoy | fed sec l rep p 95,903 united states of america plaintiff-appellee v fred c tallant sr. and william m womack jr... | RESOLUCION de 12 de agosto de 1988, de la Dirección General de Personal, por la que se hace pública la adjudicación definitiva para cubrir, en régimen de comisión ...