Unpublished Disposition Notice: Tenth Circuit Rule 36.3 States that Unpublished Opinions and Orders and Judgments Have no Precedential Value and Shall Not Be Cited Except for Purposes of Establishing the Doctrines of the Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Lin Edward Davis, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack Dempsey Pointer, Jr., Defendant-Appellee., 930 F.2d 33 (10th Cir. 1991)

Federal Circuits, 10th Cir. (February 20, 1991)

Docket number: 90-6181
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37360697
Id. vLex: VLEX-37360697

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Clara Barnard, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Mark Young A/K/a John Young, Jr., and Dr. Robert O'Toole, Superintendent of Eastern State Hospital of Vinita, Oklahoma, Defendants-Appellees., 720 F.2d 1188 (10th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Dr. Robert E. Pitts, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Turner and Boisseau, Chartered, Lee Turner, Eldon L. Boisseau, Hal D. Meltzer, John L. Carmichael, Deborah L. Carney, Casey Law, Cynthia G. Barrett, Interstate National Insurance, Maginnis and Associates, Robert T. Stephan, Harold S. Youngentob, H. Phillip Elwood, Arthur E. Palmer, Edwin D. Smith, and Justice B. King, Defendants-Appellees., 850 F.2d 650 (10th Cir. 1988)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Text:

Before McKAY, JOHN P. MOORE and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Davis filed a pro se Sec. 1983 action against the lawyer who defended Mr. Davis in a prior federal criminal prosecution. The district court dismissed the action because the defendant was not a state actor as required by Sec. 1983. That ruling is correct. Pitts v. Turner and Boisseau, Chartered, 850 F.2d 650, 653 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 (1989); Barnard v. Young, 720 F.2d 1188, 1189 (10th Cir.1983).

AFFIRMED.

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Other documents:

7 cfr 1773.7 - audit standards. | Frank J Ginett Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant v Computer Task Group Inc. Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee. 962 F.2d 1085 2nd Cir 1992 | organization | u.s. v. daniels (gary e.), 914 f.2d 245 (3rd cir. 1990) | boone v liberty life 6th cir 2005 | anasagasti el informe del supremo sobre liano es un abuso de poder | breves | Case of Audiencia Provincial Huelva Seccion 2 n 193/2006 of October 11 2006 | anuncio de la delegación provincial de huelva, por el que se practican notificaciones que se citan. | Lateral entre 16,9 y 17,5 | kenard dwight johnson v. u.s. attorney general (11th cir. 2007)

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

Citations:

Text:

Case Law