Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Everett Collins, Defendant-Appellant., 931 F.2d 894 (6th Cir. 1991)

Federal Circuits, 6th Cir. (May 01, 1991)

Docket number: 90-5278
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/37364462
Id. vLex: VLEX-37364462

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

Before KEITH and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and COHN, District Judge.*

ORDER

Frank Everett Collins, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion, in which he challenged the imposition of a four year period of special parole. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and the record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Seeking to vacate a portion of his sentence providing for special parole, Everett filed a Rule 35(a) motion claiming that, under 21 U.S.C. Sec . 841(b)(1), the court was without authority to impose a four year period of special parole as part of his sentence. The district court denied the motion concluding that the four year term was authorized under the law in effect at the time of Collins's conviction. Collins has filed a timely appeal from this order.

Upon review, we vacate the district court's judgment. Between October 27, 1986 and November 1, 1987, 21 U.S.C. Sec . 841(b)(1) provided for a period of supervised release for defendants sentenced under that statute. Gozlon-Peretz v. United States, 111 S.Ct. 840 (1991). Hence, Collins's argument that the statute does not allow a period of either special parole or supervised release for defendants convicted of crimes during this period is without merit. Id. Accordingly, we hereby vacate the district court's judgment and remand to the district court for resentencing to a four year term of supervised release in lieu of the four year term of special parole. Rule 9(b)(6), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

* The Honorable Avern Cohn, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Other documents:
Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,738, 3 Ucc Rep.Serv.2D 1175 in Re Esm Government Securities, Inc., Debtor. Thomas Te... | sisk v. falcon prod inc (6th cir. 2006) | 2 USC 1384 Sec 1384 Substantive regulations | Su último día en bolsa | titel 8 anleihen und darlehen | Si es un niño, qué será de Leonor | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia Barcelona Cataluña Sala de lo Social of May 15 2001 | McGoldrick v McKune 10th Cir 2006 | RESOLUCION de 8 de Marzo de 1985, del VICECONSEJERO DE TRABAJO, ordenando el cumplimiento de la Sentencia dictada ... | CORRECCION de errata a la Orden de 8 de enero de | los cowboys *** | Resolución de 9 de junio de 2008 de la Secretaría de Estado de Cambio Climáti...