OS 422 of 2011; Thomas Taiya Ambi—Chairman and Director of Parapia PDL1 Holdings Ltd and Parapia Pdl 1 Holdings Ltd v Exxon Mobil Limited and Oil Search Limited and Hon. Francis Potape-Minister for Petroleum and Energy and Rendel Remua-Secretary for Department of Petroleum and Energy and John Andrias-Secretary for Department of Commerce and Industry and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Hides Gas Development Corporation Limited (2012) N4844
Jurisdiction | Papua New Guinea |
Judge | Hartshorn J |
Judgment Date | 27 July 2012 |
Court | National Court |
Citation | (2012) N4844 |
Year | 2012 |
Judgement Number | N4844 |
Full Title: OS 422 of 2011; Thomas Taiya Ambi—Chairman and Director of Parapia PDL1 Holdings Ltd and Parapia Pdl 1 Holdings Ltd v Exxon Mobil Limited and Oil Search Limited and Hon. Francis Potape-Minister for Petroleum and Energy and Rendel Remua-Secretary for Department of Petroleum and Energy and John Andrias-Secretary for Department of Commerce and Industry and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Hides Gas Development Corporation Limited (2012) N4844
National Court: Hartshorn J
Judgment Delivered: 27 July 2012
N4844
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
[IN THE NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]
OS 422 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
THOMAS TAIYA AMBI – Chairman and Director of Parapia PDL1 Holdings Ltd
First Plaintiff
AND:
PARAPIA PDL 1 HOLDINGS LTD
Second Plaintiff
AND:
EXXON MOBIL LIMITED
First Defendant
AND:
OIL SEARCH LIMITED
Second Defendant
AND:
HON. FRANCIS POTAPE-Minister for Petroleum and Energy
Third Defendant
AND:
RENDEL REMUA-Secretary for Department of Petroleum and Energy
Fourth Defendant
AND:
JOHN ANDRIAS-Secretary for Department of Commerce and Industry
Fifth Defendant
AND:
THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Sixth Defendant
AND:
HIDES GAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
Seventh Defendant
Waigani: Hartshorn J.
2012: 18th May
: 27th July
Application to dismiss proceeding
Facts:
The second defendant, Oil Search Ltd, applies to dismiss this proceeding pursuant to Order 12 Rule 40 National Court Rules and this court’s inherent jurisdiction on the grounds that the plaintiffs do not have the locus standi to bring this proceeding.
Held:
1. The first and second plaintiffs do not have the necessary standing to bring this proceeding. Consequently the proceeding should be dismissed as being frivolous or vexatious, an abuse of the process of the court, and for not disclosing a reasonable cause of action
2. The National Court does not have the jurisdiction to determine a dispute concerning the ownership of customary land. If prosecuted, this claim is bound to fail. As such it is frivolous and vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court.
Cases cited:
Ronny Wabia v. BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd [1998] PNGLR 8
21 ILGs Gobe Project Area Incorporated Land Groups v. The State (2006) N3096
Nimamar Rural ILG v. Thomas Tanasu Ltd (2009) N3758
Louis Lucian Siu v. Wasime Land Group Incorporated (2011) SC1107
Counsel:
Mr. T. Anis, for the Second Defendant
27th July, 2012
1. HARTSHORN J: The second defendant, Oil Search Ltd, applies to dismiss this proceeding pursuant to Order 12 Rule 40 National Court Rules and this court’s inherent jurisdiction. I allowed this application to be heard in the absence of representation on behalf of the plaintiffs as I was satisfied that the notice of motion had been served upon the lawyers for the plaintiffs and that they had been informed of the motion’s hearing date and time.
2. Oil Search seeks the dismissal of the proceeding on a number of grounds. The first ground that I shall consider is whether the plaintiffs have standing or locus standi to bring this proceeding. If the plaintiffs did not have the necessary standing, then the proceeding is frivolous or vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court: 21 ILGs Gobe Project Area Incorporated Land Groups v. The State (2006) N3096, Nimamar Rural ILG v. Thomas Tanasu Ltd (2009) N3758. It can also be argued that if the plaintiffs have no standing, no reasonable cause of action is disclosed as any cause of action disclosed cannot reasonably be brought by the plaintiffs.
3. It is submitted by Oil Search that the plaintiffs did not have the necessary standing as:
a) the plaintiffs’ claim to be owners of customary land and seek relief in respect of customary land.
b) only individual citizens of Papua New Guinea and not a company can own customary land,
c) the first plaintiff sues in the capacity of the Chairman and a Director of a company and the second plaintiff is that company,
d) the claim by the second plaintiff company that it owns customary land is misconceived,
e) the first plaintiff as an officer of a company and the second plaintiff as a company do not have the necessary standing to seek the relief that they do and indeed to bring this proceeding seeking that relief.
4. I agree with Oil Search’s submissions in this regard. Pursuant to s. 2 (1) Land Act, in that Act, customary land is land that is owned or possessed by an automatic citizen or a community of automatic citizens and a “citizen” does not include a company. The second plaintiff's claim to be the owner of customary land is not sustainable. The first and second plaintiffs do not have the necessary standing to bring this proceeding. Consequently the proceeding should be dismissed as being frivolous or vexatious, an abuse of the process of the court, and for not disclosing a reasonable cause of action.
5. Notwithstanding this finding, I will consider another ground upon which Oil Search seeks dismissal of the proceeding.
6. The plaintiffs’ claims are in essence that they are the true customary landowners of the subject land and that the defendants, including Oil Search, have been dealing with persons who are not the true landowners of the subject land. Consequently, submit the plaintiffs, they have not received benefits to which they are entitled for the last 21 years. Oil Search submits that this raises a dispute as to the ownership of the subject customary land and the National Court does not have jurisdiction to determine such disputes.
7. I agree with these submissions of Oil Search....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Doriga Mahuru, Maiva Mahuru, Mahuru Doriga, Max Doriga & Kuruku Nao v Hon Lucas Dekena, Minister For Lands & Physical Planning and John Ofoi, Acting Secretary, Department of Lands & Physical Planning and Henry Wasa, Registrar of Titles and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Ava Mika, Kila Gabutu & Michael John Madi (2013) N5305
...The Papua Club Inc v Nusaum Holdings Ltd (No 2) (2004) N2603 The State v Lohia Sisia [1987] PNGLR 102 Thomas Taiya Ambi v Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 West New Britain Provincial Government v Kimas (2009) N3834 Yakananda Business Group Inc v Minister for Lands (2001) N2159 JUDICIAL REVIEW T......
-
Mola Taluari v Lagayu Hewa People’s Association Inc
...Trade Ltd [1921] 2 AC 438 Tender Wak v. John Wia (2008) N3356 Takori v.Yagari & Ors (2008) SC905 Thomas Taiya Ambi v. Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 Overseas case The Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v. British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd [1921] Counsel: Mr. L. Agilo, for the Plaintiffs ......
-
SC REF NO 2 OF 2014: Reference by The National Court Pursuant To Constitution, Section 18(2), In Respect Of Os (Jr) No 485 Of 2014 SC REF NO 3 OF 2014: Reference By The National Court Pursuant To Constitution, Section 18(2), In Respect Of OS NO 484 OF 2014 SC REF NO 5 OF 2014: Reference by The Attorney-General Pursuant To Constitution, Section 19(1) in the matter of the powers, functions, duties and responsibilities of the Commissioner of Police in relation to warrants of arrest issued under the Arrest Act Chapter 339 and Charges of Contempt of Court (2014) SC1388
...(2005) SC785 Stephen John Rose v Neville Devete (2007) N3327 The State v Lohia Sisia [1987] PNGLR 102 Thomas Taiya Ambi v Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 REFERENCES This is the determination of three constitutional references. 1. BY THE COURT: This is the determination of three constitutional ......
-
Pepi Kimas, Secretary for Lands & Physical Planning and Benjamin Samson, Deputy Registrar of Titles and Hon Dr Puka Temu, Minister for Lands and Physical Planning and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea v Arua Loa, Areni Igo & Lakani Oala (2015) SC1475
...Tirupia (Re Vunapaladig and Japalik Land) [1971-72] PNGLR 229 The State v Lohia Sisia [1987] PNGLR 102 Thomas Taiya Ambi v Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 Wak v John Wia (2008) N3356 APPEAL This was an appeal against the granting by the National Court of an application for judicial review by p......
-
Doriga Mahuru, Maiva Mahuru, Mahuru Doriga, Max Doriga & Kuruku Nao v Hon Lucas Dekena, Minister For Lands & Physical Planning and John Ofoi, Acting Secretary, Department of Lands & Physical Planning and Henry Wasa, Registrar of Titles and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Ava Mika, Kila Gabutu & Michael John Madi (2013) N5305
...The Papua Club Inc v Nusaum Holdings Ltd (No 2) (2004) N2603 The State v Lohia Sisia [1987] PNGLR 102 Thomas Taiya Ambi v Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 West New Britain Provincial Government v Kimas (2009) N3834 Yakananda Business Group Inc v Minister for Lands (2001) N2159 JUDICIAL REVIEW T......
-
Mola Taluari v Lagayu Hewa People’s Association Inc
...Trade Ltd [1921] 2 AC 438 Tender Wak v. John Wia (2008) N3356 Takori v.Yagari & Ors (2008) SC905 Thomas Taiya Ambi v. Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 Overseas case The Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v. British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd [1921] Counsel: Mr. L. Agilo, for the Plaintiffs ......
-
SC REF NO 2 OF 2014: Reference by The National Court Pursuant To Constitution, Section 18(2), In Respect Of Os (Jr) No 485 Of 2014 SC REF NO 3 OF 2014: Reference By The National Court Pursuant To Constitution, Section 18(2), In Respect Of OS NO 484 OF 2014 SC REF NO 5 OF 2014: Reference by The Attorney-General Pursuant To Constitution, Section 19(1) in the matter of the powers, functions, duties and responsibilities of the Commissioner of Police in relation to warrants of arrest issued under the Arrest Act Chapter 339 and Charges of Contempt of Court (2014) SC1388
...(2005) SC785 Stephen John Rose v Neville Devete (2007) N3327 The State v Lohia Sisia [1987] PNGLR 102 Thomas Taiya Ambi v Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 REFERENCES This is the determination of three constitutional references. 1. BY THE COURT: This is the determination of three constitutional ......
-
Pepi Kimas, Secretary for Lands & Physical Planning and Benjamin Samson, Deputy Registrar of Titles and Hon Dr Puka Temu, Minister for Lands and Physical Planning and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea v Arua Loa, Areni Igo & Lakani Oala (2015) SC1475
...Tirupia (Re Vunapaladig and Japalik Land) [1971-72] PNGLR 229 The State v Lohia Sisia [1987] PNGLR 102 Thomas Taiya Ambi v Exxon Mobil Ltd (2012) N4844 Wak v John Wia (2008) N3356 APPEAL This was an appeal against the granting by the National Court of an application for judicial review by p......