Shannon v. Commonwealth of VA (4th Cir. 2007)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (December 17, 2007)

Docket number: 07-1414
Not Published Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/42931054
Id. vLex: VLEX-42931054

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1414

ANDREW SHANNON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

JUVENILE JUSTICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00413-JRS)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr., THE GEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of

Virginia, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Peter R.

Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General/Chief, Gregory C.

Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Andrew Shannon appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on his retaliation claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Shannon v. Virginia Dep't of Juvenile Justice, No. 3:06-cv00413-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Other documents:
Joseph Paul Et Al., Petitioners, v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir. 1975) | Lieutenant Richard C. Taylor, Petitioner-Appellant, v. the Honorable W. Graham Clayt... | 50 CFR 21.22 Banding or marking permits. | Wust gana la segunda etapa en Aragon | de langreo | woolum v bucholz ohio 2005 | case of audiencia nacional sala de lo contencioso of february 07 2007 | Case of Audiencia Provincial - Lleida, Seccion 2 n 49/2008, of February 13, 2008 | El Solitario culpa a un terrorista corso de un doble crimen | Case of Tribunal Superior de Justicia - Valladolid, Castilla y León - Sala de lo Social, of March 03, 2... | EDICTO de 14 de julio de 1993, sobre una resolución del conseller de Política Ter...